There was a time when 32- and 37-inch TVs were the most sought-after. With a massive reduction in TV prices and people wanting larger and larger screens, those days are over. Call us spoilt, but we consider 42 inches to be the smallest TV we'd ever plonk in our lounge these days. The normal rules of society are lost on us geeks, so you might prefer a smaller telly -- and Panasonic thinks it might have a TV relevant to your interests.
The Viera TX-L32D25 is an LED-illuminated, 32-inch LCD TV. It costs around £900 or so, at the time we put key to Web page. That's quite the pricey 32-inch telly, especially when you consider you can get one of last year's Sony Bravia TVs for less than £400. That's not fair on the Panasonic, as it has many more features, but we can't help but think people looking to save money will see 32 inches and assume these smaller TVs are much of a muchness.
A style of its own
The L32D25 looks unconventional to say the least. The back of the TV is finished in a standard silver, as is the remote. But the front of the TV is a total departure -- a deep brown colour that no doubt sounds unappealing, but trust us, it looks much better. In fact, we really like how this TV looks. It's certainly encouraging to see the usually conservative Panasonic depart from its normal, boring, piano-black design.
This TV is also extremely thin and light, which makes it ideal for wall-mounting, if you're a little short of space, or simply want something compact for a study or bedroom. The LED backlight means the TV is thinner than most of Panasonic's previous generation of LCD TVs. It all adds to the super styling, which we're really rather sold on.
It doesn't get much attention any more, but the viewing angle of your TV will seriously affect the picture quality, especially if you have an unusually shaped lounge, and can't sit directly in front of your TV. The Panasonic features an IPS Alpha panel, which is designed for wider than average viewing angles.
Everybody needs good Neighbours
Sound performance was varied on the material we tested. On Neighbours, we could hear every word quite clearly, but when we switched over to Deal or No Deal, we found the audio rather more muddled. It was never dreadful though, and a TV of this size is unlikely to be used as the centrepiece of a home-cinema system. External speakers of some kind will always add a great deal to the experience of watching TV, however small it is.
The L32D25 features Panasonic's trademark dual satellite and terrestrial tuners. Freeview HD and freesat have been covered in detail by us before, so we won't go into the nitty-gritty of them again. But it's great to see Panasonic fitting both tuners to its TVs across such a large swathe of its range. You'll get BBC HD, ITV1 HD and 4HD at no extra cost, which makes this an ideal candidate for the upcoming World Cup, which will be broadcast in HD.
The picture quality of Freeview HD and standard Freeview will obviously vary greatly. BBC HD can look stunning on this TV, however, with some of the preview loop clips really jumping out of the screen at you. Other shots lack this depth, but still have a decent amount of detail. HD demo material that will blow you away includes Lark Rise to Candleford and the most recent incarnation of Doctor Who, which is shot on high-end, cinema-grade cameras, and looks divine.
Mini Blu-ray
The small size of this TV, and its ability to accept 1080p video, means that Blu-ray looks as sharp as a razor, and there is plenty of detail in movies on the HD format. The TV is slightly too small to really make HD movies come alive, but the decent picture will keep gamers in particular happy. This TV is exceptionally well suited as a second TV, or perhaps for a teenager looking to get a first bedroom TV. Any teenager with aspirations of buying one of these will need to be seriously well-off to afford one, of course. That'd be quite some paper round.

User reviews1
Add your review
perfectionist54 4 January 2011
Bad: Very poor Standard Definition picture.
Comment: I bought this TV after reading several reviews giving it the highest ratings, but I've been bitterly disappointed and have returned the set. There's one reason for that; the terrible picture quality. Sure, this LED edge lit LCD is above average when compared to others with similar technology, but compared side by side with an average CRT set displaying the same feed, it's dire. Blurry, lacking in fine detail, cartoonish colours.
Standard Definition broadcasts - which, after all, still make up the bulk of the content broadcast in the UK - are rendered in a blurred mess with numerous odd processing artifacts created as the set desperately tries to upscale. Even after three hours of continuous adjustments, readjustments, switching on and off of all the fancy enhancement features, the picture was still not a match for a mid-range 6 year old Toshiba CRT. It's passable, but no more, and that is being generous.
HD fares much better on the sharpness and detail front, but it's ruined by the obsession with black. Yes, the blacks are fantastic, but they've been achieved at the expense of dark greys, which are rendered equally black. Every little bit of dark grey and shadow detail is gone and no amount of contrast/lightness adjustment and balance brings it back. The best I achieved was by reducing the set's gamma from its default 2.2 to 1.8, which brought out some of the grey and shadow detail but at the cost of washing out the colours elsewhere.
If you haven't viewed a CRT set in a while, you've probably forgotten just how good they are relative to LCD sets. This Panasonic is among the best of a bad bunch. LCD, whether it's with fancy LED back-lighting, 100hz technology, trick upscaling or whatever, has a long way still to go until it beats CRT.
It's not all doom and gloom though. The set is easy to set up, the menus are intuitive, connectivity is excellent, multiple tuners are great and it's quite attractive. I just cannot excuse it its poor picture, which, surely, is why anyone buys a TV.
Oh yes, the sound. Not bad, but you'll need extra speakers if you want it to sound better than an orchestra of biscuit tins...
And probably the most stupid niggle of all? Even with the aspect ratio set to auto, it doesn't recognise and correctly display 4:3 pictures, which it insists on stretching to a full 16:9. The viewer has to manually change the aspect ratio each time he encounters a 4:3 picture. Why have an auto setting if it doesn't work? Crazy.
See all user reviews