This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Panasonic TH42PE50 review

Our rating

2.5 stars out of 5

User rating

2.5 stars out of 5

See all 2 user reviews

What do you think?

Verdict

Show Panasonic's TH42PE50 to the average consumer, and they're likely to drool over one of the best-looking televisions out there. However, scratch the surface and you'll find it's missing vital components. With an unbelievably poor resolution, lack of high-definition compatibility and below-par connectivity, this is far from a wise investment

Good

  • Common Interface slot
  • Groovy design
  • Good picture with standard definition sources

Bad

  • Poor resolution
  • Lack of PC compatibility and high definition
  • Poor connectivity in general

In this review

While many companies were happy to bang out plasmas and rely on their flat charms to appeal to the public, Panasonic's famous Viera advertisements drew attention to just how slinky these things could look. But now all the ultra-rich inhabitants of Knightsbridge have one hanging on their walls, Panasonic is bringing its plasmas to a budget audience. Is it time to jump headlong into the future of television?

The bad news is that Panasonic has been very slow in adopting the high-definition standards, and it isn't about to play its trump card on the lower end of the market with the TH42PE50. So while the level of style has remained intact, the company still doesn't meet the technical demands of a market that now demands high definition and a good selection of AV inputs.

Sure, the TH42PE50's picture quality is very nice, the Freeview adaptor is very welcome, and the ability to record to SD card may appeal to those with portable video players. However, without even the most basic connectors (S-video, composite and PC), and with an unbelievably low screen resolution, the Panasonic looks outdated by years. Even though it's set at a relatively attractive price, plasmas from Hitachi and Pioneer are much better investments for £2,000. We have high hopes for the high-definition version of the Panasonic, but we can't recommend the TH42PE50.

Design
This Panasonic plasma is a real looker. It doesn't have any extravagant touches, but it has a simple, understated presence that manages to look classy rather than boring. The screen is surrounded by a smooth black frame, and the stand is nice and curvy, although it doesn't swerve or tilt. Underneath the solitary Panasonic logo is a grille that hides two 8W speakers.

With digital TV boxes, games consoles and DVD players all fighting it out for space in the cabinet, a TV needs at least three Scart connectors to cope. The TH42PE50 happily meets the criteria, with AV1 and AV3 being RGB-enabled, and AV2 and AV3 capable of input and output.

But what if you've got a camcorder or older games console that you want to plug into the TV? Most companies fit a standard set of S-video and composite inputs on the front of the TV so you can easily connect equipment that you use less regularly. The TH42PE50 disagrees with this convention, so you'll need to buy a Scart adaptor and start fiddling round the back of the Panasonic if you plan to do this. It's cumbersome, especially if you have your plasma hanging on the wall.

Picture fanatics will be glad to see Panasonic has endowed its plasma with component inputs, which can provide the television with silky smooth progressive-scan images. It's such a shame, then, that Panasonic didn't go one further and include a high-definition compatible digital video socket. Not only does the television lack high-definition compatibility, but also it's no use if you plan to connect up a Media Center PC. There's no HD content around at the moment, so it isn't a massive issue until the end of the year, but expect more and more AV equipment to start needing DVI connectivity to look its best.

Features
Let's get our major sticking point out of the way first -- the panel resolution is a paltry 852x480 pixels, meaning it isn't even close to being high definition. In fact, standard 576-line PAL broadcasts have to be scaled down to fit on the screen. Reactions varied between physical disgust and instant dismissal from the CNET editorial team, because the only other plasma we've seen with such a low resolution is from budget king Tiny. However, we have to admit that lower-quality sources such as camcorders look good running at this resolution, simply because their flaws aren't being massively inflated by a high-resolution screen.

The lack of HDMI or DVI socket also means that the Panasonic is in no way ready for high definition. Many people considering a plasma or LCD are driven by the massive jump in quality that high definition will offer, and material is due to arrive before the end of 2006. The upcoming Sky HD service demands this connectivity, so we're astonished that a big manufacturer like Panasonic is marketing a plasma without this compatibility. While it may need to clear remaining stocks (and the next range will be fully HD), we think there'll be more than a few unwitting buyers out there.

It's not all bad news, because the integrated Freeview adaptor means you can plug in the aerial as normal, and then watch either digital or analogue broadcasts. The interface for Freeview is pretty clean, if unspectacular, but you can call up 'Now and Next' programme detail at the touch of a button. If don't live in a Freeview coverage area, you can use an analogue TV signal, but it looks horrible.

The integrated Freeview receiver provides a good picture, especially when compared to a standard box that plugs into the Scart socket. There's a noticeable lack of the blocking that seems to rear its ugly head whenever you connect a standard Freeview box to a digital screen, and there's no colour bleeding.

Performance
The low resolution of the screen actually gives it certain advantages, because it makes standard definition TV sources look fairly acceptable. The colour reproduction is not spectacular, though -- the green of Wimbledon's Centre Court grass looked fake and there was a definite loss of detail during movement. There was also next to no shadow detail, which was offputting on the contours of people's faces and quite distracting during darker TV programmes.

DVD films are very enjoyable though, especially when using the component inputs. Compatible DVD players are available for as little as £60 now and it does deserve the investment. There was still a noticeable lack of contrast depth, but there's far more detail to be seen when you switch to progressive-scan mode.

We also thought that audio performance was pretty good. These speakers can go fairly loud but their main attraction is how detailed they are. There's a real clarity to vocals and they can even pick out environmental effects in a show as mundane as EastEnders.

Edited by Mary Lojkine
Additional editing by Nick Hide

  • Print

User reviews2

Add your review

Jonathan Crookes's avatar
4.5 stars out of 5

Jonathan Crookes 31 December 2005

Good: Fabulous colour reproduction and contrast. Great for TV and DVD.

Bad: Average EPG.

Comment: I recently bought one after extensive research and auditioning at various high-street stores. Time and time again, and in different shops, this set stood out as having the best picture quality on display!

Not sure what the complaint about the resolution is. Aren't all SD & ED 42" plasmas 852x480 pixels in resolution? Don't forget, this is perfect for NTSC material, and very good for PAL.

Also, the complaint about colour and contrast is totally wrong. On the contrary, the outstanding colour reproduction and contrast really gives the picture a 3D-like depth. This is the real strength of this set. Far, far better than the washed-out LCDs, and much better than most other plasmas.

Connectivity is fine. Three Scart sockets and HD Compliant component. Dedicated S-Video is missing, along with a composite-video (not missing much there though), but these are implemented in the Scart sockets. No DVI or HDMI, but why should there be? Connectivity is not an issue for me.

I think the reviewer was obsessed about the HD thing. Sure, HD is the future, but for many people this is several years off yet. Better to get (and enjoy) a television that excels with the material we use now rather than think about what we'll be using in 2012.

The pinnacle of standard and enhanced definition television! But don't pay the £1,800 SRP. Street price of £1,350 (including a Panasonic DVD recorder) makes it a great deal.

armin schmid's avatar
0.5 star out of 5

armin schmid 4 September 2005

Good: Black levels

Bad: See above

Comment: This is by far the fairest test I read so far.
For eight generations now Panasonic sold NTSC panels to us customers in PAL countries without even trying to integrate DVI or HDMI compatibility with 50Hz frame rates. Even the PV 500 HD panel lacks this feature. You won't be able to connect a PC or Mac as a home theatre center and drive the panel with its native resolution at 50Hz, so all kind of motion artefacts and judder will be introduced with 60Hz US frame rates.
You can read about this awful situation over in the plasma section of the British avforum and at beisammen.de in Germany.<br><br>
No, and Panasonic will not sell a panel to me as long as they treat customers in Europe or Australia as second-class citizens.

Tell us what you think

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Step 1

0 out of 5

Step 2

Submit

Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment

Should I buy it?

Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Panasonic TH42PE50

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.