It may not have taken the world by storm quite like the upgrade to high definition did, but 3D TV still has the power to amaze, especially the first time you try it out. The technology has fast become a standard feature on high-end TVs and we've even started to see budget 3D sets appearing on the market.
There are two systems currently used to produce 3D images -- 'active' and 'passive'. The main difference is the glasses.
Active screens require specs with a battery-powered liquid crystal shutter system that turns on and off in time with a sync signal from the TV. This produces the 3D effect. Passive goggles, on the other hand, are not powered. Instead, they use polarised lenses that work in conjunction with a filter on the front of the screen.
LG developed the passive 3D system on its own and currently all passive 3D TVs use LG panels. Unsurprisingly, all of LG's LED TVs have passive technology, but now some other manufacturers are building passive 3D TVs using the South Korean company's panels. These include Toshiba, Philips, Cello, and more recently, Panasonic.
However, Toshiba, Philips and Panasonic also produce active 3D TVs, while Samsung and Sony exclusively use active technology in their sets. Because of the way plasma TVs produce images, all plasma tellies -- even LG's models -- employ active rather than passive tech.
Both systems have strengths and weaknesses. The major advantage of the passive system is the glasses, which are extremely cheap. They only cost around £2 each, while active specs can set you back as much as £100 a pair. This makes passive 3D TVs ideal for enjoying 3D movies or broadcasts with the whole family or a big group of friends.
The low price also means you don't need to worry about them breaking as the replacement costs are very low. This is an important consideration if you have young children, especially as the expensive active specs can be a tad fragile.
Passive 3D sets also tend not to have an issue with cross-talk -- image ghosting on the edges of objects -- as long as you don't view the screen from a vertical angle of more than 15 degrees. The passive glasses are comfortable to wear because they're extremely light and they don't flicker, due to the lack of a shuttering system.
The downside of passive sets is they don't deliver a Full HD image when working in 3D. The passive filter on the front of the screen sends alternate lines in the image to each eye. Consequently, passive 3D images have half the horizontal resolution of active systems. In reality, it looks more like two-thirds the resolution of a Full HD image because of the way our brains process visual information. But you'll still see some jagged lines on the edges of objects now and again. This tends to be more obvious on TVs with large screens of 50 inches and above.
The advantage of TVs that use active 3D technology is they deliver a Full HD image to each eye so 3D pictures look crisper than those on passive displays. The difference isn't always that noticeable on smaller 3D screens, but with 50+ inches, the benefit is clearer as you don't get those tell-tale jagged edges of passive sets.
Active 3D TVs have some disadvantages too, not least the aforementioned price of the glasses. For this reason, many budget active 3D sets don't actually come with specs in the box -- you have to purchase them as an optional extra.
The shuttering system used on active glasses can cause flicker, which some people find fatiguing, especially when watching long 3D movies. They're generally heavier and bulkier than passive specs and so are less comfortable to wear. Some cheaper active 3D TVs can suffer from cross-talk, although the latest generation generally avoid this.
Below, I've rounded up some of my favourite TVs that will propel you into the third dimension.
Comments 20
Add your comment
anonymous 18 September, 2010 10:38
I cannot remember being this excited about new tech as I am with 3D tvs, it is a shame the glasses are expensive but, I think they look really good, I do not think people would watch 3D all the time anyway. I have always loved 3D and hope this technology really is a success and hope that other supporters come out of the woodwork, ( I need 3D to last as I do not stand the chance, if ever, of affording one)lol
Anonymous 1 January, 2011 20:01
Hi,
I have a panasonic viera 42inch 3d tv and although im waiting for most the films to come in the post i LOVE IT. Why people still criticise the technology is beyond me embrace this it is here to stay.... i hope
anonymous 30 April, 2011 07:53
I think the consumers are waiting for glass-less 3D t.v,s before making an expensive purchase that,s why they retailers are pratically giving t.v,s away i sore yesterday a lg 42" 1080p LED with 24p movie feature for £299 ! 3D t.v with glasses was just an inter-rim idea for t.v manufactors which hasn,t worked
Anonymous 24 May, 2011 09:31
can anyone give the solution about cinema 3d TV by which should i enjoy a lot but i am planning to buy a LG cinema 3d tv because i read out about its features & LG is using FPR technology which provide brighter and clearer image.
sumit22 24 May, 2011 10:24
this is a good quote given in this article that when you should go the market to buy a 3d tv first you test 3d tv by yourself from different-2 angles like screen sizes, image quality, sound and other features etc.
Anonymous 31 May, 2011 10:34
I 've also read about FPR 3d tv glasses. they are literally awesome in features; still i don't have any experience to share.
geoffh 31 May, 2011 22:51
try looking at a samsung ued7000,that will convince you that this IS the technology.
Anonymous 21 June, 2011 10:32
I am afraid, i will have nothing to share since in this article there is no LG brand. In all the panel technology the best panel is the In plane Switching (IPS) Panel and for the 3D TV is the FPR technology. Therefore it is up to youto choice the best or worst.
Anonymous 23 June, 2011 07:18
Yes, the tech makes all the difference, in LG the best thing is the IPS panel and the FPR tech which really make them to have an upper hand in the market as it is superior to other brand.
Anonymous 4 July, 2011 18:09
I had always doubted the LG TV's quality of picture but the new 3D Cinema Passive TV's are now far better than any other brand. I have the LG 47 550 LED Series and the 2D picture is brilliant as is the 3D picture plus the fact that the Cinema Passive glasses are far less stressful to the eyes than the active shutter systems used by every other brand so far and cost next to nothing (7 Came free with the set),
I also have a Panasonic 42" GT 20 3D Plasma TV and the 2D picture is excellent but the 3D is literally an eye sore. The active shutter system is not only expensive (2 Free glasses with purchase) but with the flickering in anything but a dark room is positively painful. Maybe just me but the LG Passive wins hands down on all fronts
anonymous 3 January, 2012 18:34
Hi Just bought a Techneka 42" 3d tv, does anyone have any comments on them,( surely I'm not the only one to buy one???? ) the back doesn't look strong enough for wall mounting although Tesco and the company suplying the bracket say that's not a problem, not had the courage to fix to wall yet. tv works well good picture especially on 3d. so comments please.
anonymous 17 March, 2012 16:05
lg lw650t iz da best...n i think lg all passive led 3d iz best
anonymous 5 July, 2012 18:40
I went for the Panasonic 'passive' 3D and confess to being pleasantly surprised, I wanted to upgrade to a smart HD LCD TV, and the 3D was a bonus.
super 10 July, 2012 09:42
I wasn’t so sure about the lg lm670t 3d experience until I was forced to try it. Interestingly, the tv actually made my day. Overall, the experience was good.
Ted 11 July, 2012 05:23
I like the way lg built its passive 3d tech. it’s pretty simple and comfortable.
ucleay 13 July, 2012 07:27
Thank you for the great post. I learnt a lot from you. There are some stuff I still can’t understand but I’ll keep visiting your post often and will figure out everything later :) (I am so bad with electronics). I like LG TVs due to their expertise in passive 3D technology. Also I was thinking it is the only passive 3D maker but it was interesting to know that other makes, Toshiba, Panasonic, Phillips and Cello use LG panels to make passive 3D TVs.
anonymous 15 September, 2012 02:06
Im a total technological disaster! You must excuse me! I want a huge t.v, a movie experience like non other, to be able to plug my laptop straight in and play movies from that, to be wall mounted, and just look fantastically amazing! 3D? Yep why not? Any help or ideas appriciated! cheers
anonymous 7 December, 2012 06:26
lg3d tv is very best, because i bought 55 inch led 3d tv cinema screen
anonymous 27 December, 2012 16:48
Hi, I have both types of 3d active and passive. Passive wins hands down, the shutters in active 3d are really irritating and also make the image a lot darked. Glasses are fairly heavy too.
Passive 3d is way better and the quality difference isn't noticed too much. I have the LG 42LM670T and it looks great. The other 3d they haven't mentioned is lenticular like the Nintendo 3ds which was invented by the Russians in the 50s and doesn't require glasses, but has a much smaller sweet spot. Spome TVs are using it now but they dont have the same depth.
T
anonymous 3 April, 2013 20:43
hi i recently bought a 42" lg led tv model 42lv4500 it said cinema 3d all over the box but when i got it on there was no mention of 3d in the instruction manual or no option on the remote i then rung the shop and took it back for a different model 42ls560s and paid an extra 50 pounds they reasured me this one was 3d and when i got it home it was the same all over the box cinema 3d the design was a bit different but there was still no 3d can you help me to see if it really is 3d and i just cant find the option thanks rob