High-definition television (HDTV) technology is in its infancy, so buying a satellite tuner like the HDCI-2000 to receive experimental free-to-air HD television signals (such as BBC HD) might initially seem like one step too far into the realms of frivolousness.
Hold your sensible horses though, what if the early adopters of other technologies had thought that way? What if, back in 1982, compact disc players had been met by dreary-eyed shoppers shaking in fear? What if the absence of any CDs to play on it (except Dire Strait's Brothers in Arms) turned them away? The mainstream acceptance of any technology relies on an adventurous few taking the initial plunge.
If you're not the sort of person who enjoys fiddling around with firmware updates via RS232, or working out why the signal from the Humax's HDMI output lacks the depth of blacks on the composite output, you probably won't enjoy this tuner. The HDCI-2000 is not for the faint-hearted. But is there enough chutzpah to this Humax receiver to excite the HD enthusiast? Or do teething problems with the technology fatally undermine the experience?
Design
In the beauty stakes, satellite receivers have
never ranked alongside the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. The Humax
HDCI-2000 is typically bland, but it is at least a resigned blandness.
The clean lines and utilitarian fascia make no effort to impress, so
the unit fits discretely below any television set.
The front panel hinges to reveal two Common Interface (CI) slots which accommodate pay-TV cards. There's talk on some forums of getting this unit to work with Sky cards, for example. No one's entirely clear on where HD satellite transmissions are heading, but it's possible that, as with Freeview, you may be able to subscribe to pay-TV services in the coming months. Alternatively, we may find that the majority of HD stations choose to broadcast for free, using the model established by previously pay-for Freeview stations, like E4.
A series of buttons on the front panel let you switch between video formats, change volume and channel, and toggle from radio to television. The HDCI-2000's clear LCD provides basic channel information.
Things get interesting when you turn the receiver around and explore the rear panel. Humax has provided an impressive range of connectors on this unit -- the appeal of both HDMI and composite outs is hard to understate. This means you can feed an extremely high-quality HD signal to your HDTV set.
For those with older televisions, there's always the option to use the HDCI's SCART connectors. These let you run TV out of one SCART connector and a VCR out of the other. SCART is only good enough for SD, but those making a slow transition from their existing equipment will appreciate the inclusion.
There's LNB IN and OUT for your satellite dish, a USB port and an S/PDIF connector to output digital audio to a suitably equipped amplifier. Overall, the HDCI-2000 has a hobbyist feel to its design. It has the prosaic, functional look of lab equipment -- exactly what you'd expect from fledgling technology at this stage.
Features
The HDCI-2000 will display video broadcast in
1080i, 720p and 576p. These are all the major formats you're likely to
come across at the moment. Although the Holy Grail of 1080p is not
supported, it's unlikely we'll see that broadcast by a commercial
satellite channel for a long time yet. It's also extremely unlikely
that your HDTV will display 1080p anyway.
The receiver is DVB-S and DVB-S2 compatible. This means it can receive both the original and newer standard of digital satellite transmissions. DVB-S2 is claimed to improve reception by using better error correction and adaptive coding. It's a fusion of the consumer and professional digital satellite broadcasting methods and should mean a better quality of image.




User reviews1
Add your review
Marco hdtv 24 July 2007
Good: Scan FTA only option,
Bad: Slow scan, Low quality mpeg decoding, solarisation, audio bugs
Comment: Don't be fooled by the HD MPEG4 and DVB-S2 capabilites of the device ! The quality of the picutre of the HUMAX HDCI2000 is much lower than what should be expected.
Broadcast professionals know: "HDTV means not only millions of pixels but sharpness, color depth and artifact- free pictures." and any good photographer will tell you, color depth is a key feature of a good picture. Humax 2000 is sharp but has reduced color depth and render the tv signal with the ugliest mpeg artefacts it is possible to do.
And it is a shame when thinking that today BBCHD, PRO7 or other HD channels are finally delivering content with deeper color depth and higher definition (allowed by the use of a greater bandwidth and more advanced compression algorithmes).
You may think that, by buying these new devices, you going to get the best of today technology. Well be carefull ! After the first minutes of wonder in front of the millions moving pixels, you will notice a strange thing: the picture out of the Humax HDCI-2000 is solarised (yes, like on those first bad plasma screens that were released in the market a few years ago!).
Despite having a nice gradient in shades, you got 2-3 color areas with noisy shaky hedges (for instance in skies, face skin, or blurry backgrounds which are very difficult to render because of the high number of color they require to appear realisticly). The overall picture is flat and tones slightly wrong because they are approximated to the nearest color the receiver can handle.
When watching medium-low bitrate TV programs (almost all SD signals) things go even worse: macroblocks of the mpeg highly compressed picture appear much more visible than from any other DVB receiver I tested so far. It's a pity I can't attach a picture to show you the whole disaster.
And of course, once you've noticed the problem, you will see only that. I've tested the Humax on 2 Sony Full HD Bravia LCD screens, a Sony professional reference monitor using the RGB, S-video, Component and HDMI output of the Humax and a end consumer Philips Matchline CRT TV. Same solarisation everywhere.
I made a history diagram of the picture: millions of beautiful colors at the source are heavily reduced to a few hundreds at the output of the Humax.
Other quite annoying problems I noticed are:
(1) if audio left or right is selected (usefull for dual-mono languages broadcasts), after a few minutes the receiver switch back to stereo.
(2) Audio and video are freezing from time to time, mosty when using the common interface (viaccess).
To conclude: I would recommend to wait for competitors such as PACE before making the move to High[er] Quality & High[er] Definition experience at home.
See all user reviews