One of the reasons for the success of the Eee PC 701 is its low price. By utilising low-cost components and shying away from costly Microsoft operating systems, it limbo-danced its way under the £300 marker and carved itself a huge niche in the process.
There are many among us that believe it's too niche -- mainly because its Linux-based operating system is so unfamiliar. Asus is acutely aware of this and -- not wanting to alienate a huge chunk of the market -- has released a version of the Eee PC 900 that uses Windows XP. But is it all sunshine and Care Bears, or are there any drawbacks to this configuration?
Strengths
The Windows XP version of the 900 is physically identical to its Linux brother. It uses the same 226x38x170mm, 1kg chassis, which is exceptionally convenient for throwing into a purse or manbag and taking on your travels. It's slightly larger and heavier than the previous Eee PC 701, but you'll be hard pressed to tell the difference between the two unless you see them side by side.
The Eee doesn't let its small size hold it back, though. It has plenty of connectivity, including three USB ports, a D-Sub port for outputting video to an external display, mic and headphone audio jacks and an SD card reader that also supports MMC media. Plus, the integrated webcam has been upgraded to a 1.3-megapixel model instead of the 0.3-megapixel part on the previous Eee.
The most appealing thing about the Eee PC 900 is its new display. Both the Linux and Windows versions sport an 8.9-inch panel that runs at 1,024x600 pixels. It doesn't sound like much but it's a massive improvement over the 7-inch, 800x640-pixel panel on the old Eee PC 701. Images, video and Web sites look far better on this system than they ever could on its predecessor, and it truly is better than ever for watching movies. It has to be said that the higher resolution is more suited Windows XP's icon-heavy aesthetic.
The mouse trackpad on the new Eee PC 900 is much improved over its predecessor. It's larger, for a start, and has a wider aspect ratio to match that of the widescreen display. It's also far more responsive in the Windows edition that it is on Linux. We're not exactly sure why, but positioning the cursor over tiny icons is less of a chore than the ever-so-slightly juddery cursor in the Linux edition.
Better still, the mouse trackpad supports multi-touch gesture inputs -- even in Windows XP. A pinching motion lets you zoom in on images, stretching lets you zoom out, and a two-finger vertical stroking motion allows you to scroll up and down through documents. MacBook Air and iPod touch users have enjoyed this feature for some time, but it's the first we've ever seen it implemented on a Windows laptop.
By using Windows XP, users can sidestep many of the software and hardware compatibility issues that plague the Linux version. We've encountered numerous devices that don't work with a Linux Eee because of driver issues, including some USB disc drives, printers and TV tuners. You simply don't get these problems with a Windows-equipped Eee PC 900.
It's a fair concern that Windows XP could adversely affect the laptop's performance. The Microsoft operating system is theoretically more corpulent than Linux, and is likely to put more of a strain on the components. However, we've nothing but good news to report in this area.
The 900MHz Celeron M CPU and 1GB of DDR 400 memory was perfectly happy to run Windows XP without slowing down and it ran just as smoothly and responsively as its Linux compatriot. It achieved a PCMark 2005 score of 1,133, which is actually more than the 1,049 achieved by the Sony Vaio TZ.
We spent some time analysing the Eee PC 900 Win's battery life, but discovered some unusual anomalies during that process. We will update this review with final battery scores once we have completed our benchmarks.

User reviews4
Add your review
mgnfire 2 August 2011
Good: Size & lightness, build quality, speed versitility i.e. use it for almost any application that is MS compatible.
Bad: Battery life - as an SSD netbook, I'd have expected 6-8 hrs, not 1-2hrs!
Comment: Boought to replace a Psion 5MX that finally bit the dust. Trouble is, it is so good, that you find yourself using it for web, email, video and stills etc etc.
I have a 15Gb SSD and have had no problem loading MS Office XP Pro + Nikon editor, Uplayer for DVD's (excellent by the way) Still have 7.5Gb left.
Ordered 2Gb ram upgrade from Crucial. I'll let you know how it goes.
gibuns 11 November 2008
Good: Light and small but usable size keypad
Bad: Hard drive too small to even get the machine started!
Comment: Don't get why I should have to pay for something that requires so much work just to get it doing what it says on the box? It is a mini laptop, therefore I charge it up and get to work.
But with this machine, after finding it ran out of space as soon as it came out the box, first I am supposed to download an autoc2d, which required a cd which I didn't have and the machine doesn't have a cd drive! Then something to do with 'BIOS'.....IF THE MACHINE IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE DON'T SELL IT. It's not up to customers to put ASUS's mistakes right. And don't get me started on the battery that doesn't hold a charge....back to the shop with this baby.
sandynickerson 19 September 2008
Good: Screen and size
Bad: Memory
Comment: This machine is vitually useless as the C Drive keeps running out of memory with virtually no programmes loaded except Baic Norton and MS Money.
What can I do?????
See all 4 user reviews