Features
The Samsung YP-Z5 will play MP3, WMA and secure WMA DRM audio files, so you can use subscription services like Napster To Go. There's also a JPEG photo viewer that can zoom in and out of photos -- you can select one of these as the wallpaper for your player. If you're feeling sentimental, you can play music while watching a slideshow of your pictures.
Given that Paul Mercer's team designed the menu systems on the YP-Z5, it's no surprise that it's both functional and visually impressive. The menus use a flamboyant zoom effect. Each time you select an option, it appears to fly towards you before evaporating somewhere in the foreground of the virtual world inside the player.
It's a metaphor that makes sense. You get the impression you're peeling away layers of menu hierarchy. It's not a vast functional improvement over the iPod's simple hierarchical menus, but it's fresh and easily understood. It also gives the YP-Z5's interface a strong identity that distances it from Apple's legacy.
When you want to transfer music, the YP-Z5 pulls a trick the nano can't match. Unlike an iPod, the YP-Z5 will mount on almost any file system as a generic USB drive. This means that whether you plug it into a Mac, a Windows or a Linux PC, the YP-Z5 will transfer MP3s using a simple drag and drop interface. There is no proprietary software to use -- it just works.
It can't be overstated how valuable this seemingly obvious approach is. Take Sony's players, for example, which refuse to mount on anything except a Windows PC running Sony's proprietary software. Or Creative's players, most of which refuse to mount on an OS X or Linux machine. It might seem obvious to consumers that using the tried and tested method of just dragging files onto a drive is the best way to transfer audio, but not, it would seem, to the major MP3 player manufacturers. Even Apple forces its users to run iTunes if they have an iPod.
With the YP-Z5, Samsung has sidestepped all the pitfalls of proprietary transfer software, and produced an MP3 player that doesn't put you in a software straitjacket. The perfect accompaniment to this easy transfer method would have been a standard USB connector on the player, but unfortunately the YP-Z5 uses a proprietary cable. It's a bizarre decision, given the otherwise flawless accessibility of the player. Also missing are an FM tuner and a microphone, both of which, it should be noted, are missing from every iPod.
While the YP-Z5 may fall tantalisingly short of improving on the iPod, it never works against you when you're trying to put music on it. Whether this is enough to compensate for the absence of something as easy as the Click Wheel is up for debate -- certainly this is the closest anyone's come to threatening the iPod to date.
Performance
We plugged the Samsung YP-Z5 into a pair of flat-response monitor speakers and a studio reference amp to compare audio quality between it and the iPod nano. Listening to This Isn't It by Giant Drag, the YP-Z5 sounded tight and punchy -- snare hits snapped like a prize-fighter cracking his knuckles, and the low-end was controlled and unmuddy. Our recording was a 256Kbps MP3 encoded by iTunes from the original CD.
Auditioning the same track on the iPod nano, there was little, if any, audible difference between the digital-to-analogue conversion (DAC) stage of both players. In fact, using a mixing desk to set up a cross-fader between the YP-Z5 and the nano, so that we could rapidly fade between them, the difference in clarity and tone was negligible.
Listening to Portions for Foxes by Rilo Kiley, the YP-Z5 gave this dynamic track almost the same drive and energy as the CD version. The complete frequency range was well-represented.
The YP-Z5 didn't over-emphasise the low-end and there was excellent separation between instruments. Listening to the same track on the nano, the difference was extremely subtle. The iPod nano has a very good reputation for sound quality among audiophiles -- this is largely attributed to the high-quality DAC stage and the inherent low noise of solid-state flash storage. Our tests demonstrated that the YP-Z5 can also compete at this level.
Listening on headphones, the YP-Z5 delivered a volume that went well beyond what our ears could bear. You won't want for volume on this player. The bundled black ear-buds are well made and deliver a fidelity of sound that will be good enough for all but the most discerning listeners. Insulation on the ear-buds could be better, but the fact they're not white makes a refreshing change.
If you're tired of MP3 players that force you to use proprietary software, the YP-Z5 is one of the best options out there. For those who are unsure, we'd recommend trying the YP-Z5's interface before you buy -- the shadow of the Click Wheel looms large.
Edited by Mary Lojkine
Additional editing by Nick Hide
User reviews4
Add your review
Phil Hazelton 27 March 2007
Good: Styling, audio quality, format support
Bad: Critically flawed battery, lack of support from Samsung
Comment: This has the potential to be a fantastic product, but beware: it does have its flaws.
The battery life is advertised at ~40 hours, and playing continuously I have managed to eke around 30 out of it. But the problem is, this is not how most people use their MP3 players. Usually, you would listen to it for a few hours (I use mine on the journey to/from college every day) and the rest of the time it's turned off. Or is it?
See, Samsung put in a very handy "standby" mode, which means that the player boots lightning fast. Lovely. The problem comes with the power consumption of this mode. It seems to suck almost as much power out of the device as it does when it's turned on. The device only turns itself off properly after 24 hours; the user has absolutely no say in this.
The upshot is that if you use your player once or twice a day, as I do, it's very likely that it will be sat in standby mode pretty much all the time. As a result, I can only expect to get around 3-4 hours of actual usage, before I'm told that the battery is too low, and the device refuses to turn on.
The other pain is the horrendously inaccurate power display. It has four settings: 'full', 'almost full', 'almost empty', and 'off'. Of the three working settings, it seems to stay on full for around 75% of the time. This means that you can switch off the device one afternoon, whilst it's still reading 'full', pick it up the next morning, and it won't turn on because it's out of juice.
And the worst thing of all is: this isn't a fault, it's just a really, really poor design. It's a shame that Samsung invested so much in the looks of this device (and it does look fantastic) and so little in the actual usability.
The interface is well layed-out, with the only issue for me being a lack of support for looping playlists. By this, I mean you cannot scroll 'up' from 'A' to 'Z', instead you are forced to go through your entire list. It can also become laggy when you load album art onto the device. I would recommend leaving it off: song changes can take up to half a second when the device has to load a new image.
It still gets a 6 despite these issues, but be warned that if your usage pattern is similar to mine, you will not be able to use this device to its full potential.
Kyus Agu-Lionel 14 January 2007
Good: Sounds great. Looks great, intuitive menu trees, doesn't scratch easily, straightforward music transfer, lovely screen, almost as small as a nano
Bad: Almost as small as a nano, touchpad easy to use but not as fast as a clickwheel, no games, no PDA aplications, no radio, no in line recording
Comment: I have the 4GB version and I am infatuated with it. It is small and lightweight. I do have a few minor niggles with it though. Samsung are the main supplier of flash drives for the nano and so I am thinking, why not use the same drives for the YP-Z5? It is almost twice as thick as the iPod and this, I know, is partly due to a bigger battery, but Apple still manages to get 24 hours out of its new nano so why couldn't Samsung have done the same? The touchpad is easy to use but, when traversing my 4GB of music, I wish for the speed of the clickwheel or the Creative Vision m's touch strip. This player was pitched as an 'iPod killer' so if it is such then where are the organiser aplications? Where is the FM tuner? Where are the games? Where is the line in recording and voice recording? Where is the video playback support? But the place where it really excels is in music playback. The provided earphones are excellent quallity and the player sounds great and gets plenty loud!
Lyn Denny 27 December 2006
Good: Ease of use
Bad: Touchpad is fiddly, instructions are useless
Comment: Good, easy to deal with and looks nice too.
See all 4 user reviews