Minus a few features, the Safari Web browser found on the
iPod touch is more or less the same great browser found on the iPhone. For
instance, without the iPhone's email application or phone capabilities, email
addresses and phone numbers found on Web pages will no longer launch email or dialling
options.
Web-based email, such as Gmail or Yahoo mail, work fine in Safari, but without the ability to copy and paste text, manually entering in email addresses found on the Web can be frustrating. Just like Safari on the iPhone, Flash-based Web objects are still disabled, including embedded video players and music players.
We'd love to see embedded Flash support in the otherwise fabulous browser. Whether video content from sites like DailyMotion or Viddler or music from Web radio sites like Pandora or Slacker, embedded Flash media content is a big part of the Internet media experience.
Despite these few limitations, using Safari on a small mobile device like the iPod touch is still fun and useful. The intelligent touchscreen keyboard and multiple browser window management are a big plus.
Both the iPod touch and iPhone allow users to browse, preview, purchase and
download music from the new iTunes Wi-Fi music store, which will open in the UK in time for the launch of the touch. The store is limited
strictly to music downloads -- no movies, TV shows, podcasts or games -- at
least, not yet. You'll have to hop onto an available Wi-Fi Internet connection
to take advantage of the wireless music store but once connected, you can
search for any artist, album or song in the iTunes catalogue, as well as browse
by genre, top sellers, featured artists and new releases. Store purchases
require you to enter your iTunes password as a security measure.
Once the download is complete, the song is immediately available to listen to and will transfer to your computer's iTunes music library the next time you sync the device. The feature seemed to work without any kinks when we tried it in the US. Even interrupted downloads picked up once a Wi-Fi connection is re-established.
Complaining about the iPod touch's lack of FM radio or voice-recording
features feels like complaining about a Porsche's lack of cup holders. Still,
there are some missing features on the iPod touch that we would have enjoyed.
Performance
Putting aside the touch's sleek design, futuristic interface and innovative
feature set, the quality of its audio and video playback rank only slightly
above average. The iPod touch reportedly uses the same audio chipset as the
iPhone, but a different one to the iPod classic. The touch offers good audio
quality, but not the stellar audio we were hoping for in an expensive product.
User reviews8
Add your review
Neil Joseph 15 October 2012
Comment: Win money towards new iPod Touch
Play Wishfree.com's 20 minutes game and Win money towards new iPod Touch. Live game will
start at 10/15/2012 4:00:00 PM (UTC). Play it now: https://www.wishfree.com/game/win-money-towards-new-ipod-touch-g193
ROOTY 22 February 2012
Good: sreecn
Bad: everthing
Comment: The ipod is just hard work all round,
i also have a blackberry so much better and easier to work
VOXTER 2 February 2009
Good: Overall product design, Functions, WiFi
Bad: No Bluetooth, Sound Quality, iTunes, Pricy
Comment: Well, I'd like to keep this review as short as possible thereby I'll jz get it going
I've been using several MP3-Players from Samsung, Cowon, iRiver or Sony and among these, Apple offers the most edge-cutting design and functionality. Basically there is nothing you can't actually change. Furthermore, WiFi-supports is pretty effective but that's about it.
The iPod does not support bluetooth, which is really a pity for users who value wirelss devices. Further iTunes is without questions, a good tool, but it still causes too many problems. And to get to the core of problems: Sound-Quality.
From my point of view, Apple were able to sell a lot of their devices due to its exclusive features, and not because of its quality as a MP3 Player. Of course, those are the features people ask for, but we have to keep in mind, isn't a MP3-Players main purpose to play music in the highest possible definition?
Apple iPod Touch fails to do so, by A. providing below-average sound quality and B. not supporting HQ audio codecs such as FLAC, AAC or OGG.
Thereby my final word is: The iPod Touch is a fine deal for those who are looking for an overall device, but who really do not care about the specific qualities such as audio quality et.al.. For people who are looking for an outstanding audio envoirment grab one of the Samsung or Sony Devices.
Let's just take the P3 from Samsung as an example:
Design: Apple
Functionality: "Even" (It comes out to WiFi vs. Bluetooth but I say BT bcz WiFi is useless without a hotspot)
Audio-Quality: Samsung (DNSE3.0)
Video-Quality: Samsung (HD
Supported Formats: Samsung (FLAC, OGG. AAC)
Score: 3:1 Samsung YP-P3
I don't want to get into each and every detail, but Sony and Cowon S9 are as good as the YP-P3. Anyhow thats it.
See all 8 user reviews