The nano supports the MP3, AAC, Apple Lossless and WAV audio formats, as well as H.264 and MPEG-4 video. Movie downloads from the iTunes Store are also supported, as well as any subtitles contained within those files. Podcasts can be subscribed to and managed through iTunes, and they sync seamlessly with the nano. Press pause 8 minutes into a podcast on your computer, and it'll resume from that point on the device. The same applies to Audible audiobook downloads, which are also supported.
We'll come to video performance shortly, but first we'll address the video files themselves. The nano creates a single video file for each clip you record. On a Mac you can access these through iPhoto, or by putting the player in disk mode and browsing to them through the Finder. On a PC, you'll need to use the disk method as well. In Mac OS X Snow Leopard, QuickTime X has an integrated upload tool for YouTube, and you can exploit this to get your nano videos up on the site with a couple of clicks. Alternatively, you can always just upload the individual files via the Web site as usual.
Other features new to the nano include VoiceOver, which very effectively reads out menus and song titles to aid navigation for the visually impaired, as well as voice recording and playback, a pedometer that integrates with Nike +, and some attractive and well-designed games.

What you don't get is any multi-band EQ settings (you're still stuck with Apple's basic enhancement options), a microSD card slot for memory expansion, or support for offline playback of BBC iPlayer content -- something that many UK MP3 players now offer. But there's one flaw that's more significant than all of these combined.
In the gravest oversight, the video camera
doesn't take still photographs -- it only records video. That's probably down to
issues with physically not being able to fit a decent-enough still image sensor into the body, but the result is an epic disappointment
nonetheless.
Basic video quality
Once you discover your favourite way of avoiding obstructing the lens on the back, you can get some filming done. But you have no control over recording settings or quality. Everything is recorded at a 640x480-pixel resolution in H.264, at roughly 2.5Mbps. The data rate is variable, but these settings result in 1 minute of footage consuming about 20MB of memory, or around 1.2GB per hour. That's actually pretty good.
The problem, dearest consumer, is that the lens is so small and the microphone so tiny that the nano's video is absolutely no replacement for that of even the most basic of camcorders, although it is on a par with that of a very good camera phone. Admittedly, the nano is perfect for capturing quick clips of friends falling into waste compacters or cats doing something hilarious with a baby, and its video is in the perfect format for sharing on YouTube or Facebook. But, if you're planning on filming your holidays around the Caribbean, we'd strongly advise against using the nano as your primary video-capture device. For one thing, colours can look washed-out during outdoor filming.
As for sound quality, if you only use the cheap little earbuds that Apple provides in the box, there's not really any audible difference between this and other players. Those headphones are, as you should know, abysmal. But, if you plug in even a half-decent pair -- perhaps the Sennheiser CX 400s or the high-end Shure SE530s -- the nano delivers good sound quality. Sony's Walkman line offers more powerful, bass-packed audio, but, for the vast majority of people, the nano's sound quality will be perfectly good enough.
In terms of watching video, the nano doesn't compare to the iPod touch (or, of course, a TV). But, for its size and the cost of the device it sits inside, the nano's screen delivers excellent video quality. A tight pixel density produces crisp images, and a handy internal speaker will come in useful for watching a TV show or video podcast in bed. Be warned though: the speaker breathes new vigour into the word 'atrocious' when it comes to music -- it's just too small.
Conclusion
Without question, the fifth-generation model is Apple's best iPod nano yet, and the 16GB version is exceptionally good value. That's not to say this nano is perfect though, and, unless you badly want a video camera, there's no reason to upgrade from the previous model. Overall, it's even more feature-packed than its predecessors, yet leaves intact the spot-on functionality that we've always adored.
Edited by Charles Kloet
User reviews4
Add your review
Alan Wolfy 29 December 2010
Good: I love the colour and i want now lol
Bad: nothing
Comment: It will be great if the chance own one
ElectroDragon3 22 October 2010
Good: Price is decent, Colours
Bad: Camera in bad place
Comment: I did a review before. This is a follow up. If you want to buy it. go ahead. Its great. but i would go with the 6G as its newer and looks awesome!!
ElectroDragon3 22 October 2010
Good: Design, Thin iPod
Bad: Old Model, No Stills
Comment: Its a good device. offers some great features like FM Radio. But I'd go with the New 6G with Multi Touch and Clip
See all 4 user reviews