This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Apple iPod nano (3rd gen, video) review

Our rating

4.0 stars out of 5

User rating

3.5 stars out of 5

See all 4 user reviews

What do you think?

Verdict

Apple's new iPod nano seems to be drawing equal amounts of ire and admiration. Although we miss the slender form of the second-generation iPod nano, we feel the latest edition has more going for it than against it. At less than £100, the 4GB iPod nano offers one of the richest user experiences we've seen on an MP3 player

Good

  • Crisp, bright video playback
  • Exceptionally thin all-metal body
  • Above-average battery life
  • Built-in games
  • Advanced user interface

Bad

  • Wider body
  • Smaller scroll wheel
  • Lack of video output
  • Average-sounding audio quality

In this review

Now in its third generation, Apple's iPod nano gets a substantial redesign to accommodate games and video playback. Despite its changes -- and Apple made many -- the iPod nano is still one of the smallest, thinnest and most exquisitely designed MP3 players on the market.

It's also one of the most affordable, with a 4GB (silver) model offered for £99, and an 8GB (silver, black, red, green or blue) model for £129. While the updated iPod classic and the new iPod touch are equally intriguing, the revamped nano delivers the most bang for the buck.

Design
The redesign of the iPod nano has drawn plenty of criticism. Its detractors call it chubby, squat and awkward-looking. We certainly had our reservations, but in the hand, the latest nano makes the second-generation nano look like a skyscraper.

The nano measures a petite 51 by 70 by 6mm -- a significant shift from its once long and skinny shape, though it is essentially the same thickness. Matte, anodised aluminium graces the faceplate, as with the previous generation of nanos and now the iPod classic as well.

The back and sides of the nano, however, mimic the video iPod's (now the iPod classic) rounded, glossy, smudge-prone chrome enclosure. On the bottom edge of the nano, you'll find the iPod's proprietary USB port, along with the headphone jack and the hold switch, which prevents you from accidentally triggering the player's buttons.


The Cover Flow mode on the iPod nano is a little slow but it's a beautiful touch

The nano keeps Apple's ubiquitous Click Wheel design, although its new Click Wheel is smaller in diameter -- it's only 25mm -- than the previous nano's 32mm. The much skinnier touch strip may frustrate users accustomed to the 38mm wheel of the video iPod and the iPod classic.

The nano's most dramatic design change is, of course, its larger, brighter screen. The 51mm (2-inch) colour screen packs a dense, crisp 320x240-pixel video resolution that looks richer and brighter than that of any iPod to date.

It's not often that we deem a screen smaller than 64mm worthy of video playback, but with a tightly packed 204 pixels per inch, the nano looks incredibly sharp. Unlike the iPhone or the iPod touch, however, the nano's screen is covered with a scratch-prone plastic that will quickly show wear.

The nano's second most impressive design improvement is its dramatically overhauled menu system. One of the most striking changes is a split-screen main menu that displays the menu on the right half of the screen and a picture related to the selection on the left.

For example, highlight the Music selection on the main menu, and the right half of the screen displays a random, drifting closeup of cover artwork from your music library. This same effect accompanies menu items such as movies, podcasts and photos. Some might write this split-screen effect off as pure novelty but the end result is quite beautiful.

The Cover Flow system, for browsing your music collection with an emphasis on album artwork, finally makes its nano debut, although Cover Flow does lose some appeal when not on a touchscreen device such as the iPhone.

We also found a noticeable amount of lag when using Cover Flow. Users with large music collections to sort through will prefer browsing with the list mode or the search function. That said, Cover Flow makes for a scenic and engaging, if slow, way to browse your music.

  • Print

User reviews4

Add your review

Znxs67's avatar
3.5 stars out of 5

Znxs67 4 October 2010

Good: Small & Light

Bad: iTunes

Comment: Good little ipod but i would still go for a Zen as it is alot easier to organize you music.

I own it
Charlie Amos's avatar
2 stars out of 5

Charlie Amos 20 September 2010

Good: Easy to carry

Bad: Scratches easily, The system crashes frequently, Itunes is a pain.

Comment: m

I own it
Richard Matthews's avatar
4.5 stars out of 5

Richard Matthews 22 June 2008

Good: Best MP3 player I've owned by miles

Bad: Too easy to leave in a pocket and put in the wash

Comment: Once again, CNETs reviews just don't ring true with me. I've disliked iPods for one of the reasons you've criticised this one, i.e. they just haven't sounded any good. But the 3rd gen nano is a different story. Gone is that boring lifeless sound thats completely lacking in dynamics and we now have something that really does convey instruments, timing and the communication that the musicians intended. It's had me listening to more music than anything I've played MP3s with before.
I have done a blind comparison between the other MP3 players you mention and the nano beats all of them. The Creative Zen V Plus is not a very good sounding player and goes into distortion once you get the volume beyond 20, it's brash and spitty treble is a put off after about 20 minutes of listening. The iAudio machines on the other hand are excellent and I have used one of these for the last few years as they have been the best sounding players up until now. The 3rd gen nano has all of the qualities of the iAudio but the iAudio by comparison has a slightly metallic sounding edge to instruments. The nano is just that bit more natural sounding.
What does sadden me is that this excellent new sound quality level that Apple have found for the nano has not been carried over to the iPod Touch. The Touch loses a lot of the subtleties and detail that the nano conveys and sounds mushy by comparison, although even the Touch is still a big improvement over anything going backwards from a 3rd gen iPod.

Tell us what you think

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Step 1

0 out of 5

Step 2

Submit

Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment

Should I buy it?

Front view of Apple iPod nano

Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Apple iPod nano (3rd gen, video)

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.