Pay close attention to the new Apple iPod when you first hold one in your hands. Most of you will notice a design that's thinner, lighter and sexier than its predecessor's, as well as a new screen that dwarfs the Click Wheel. A few of you will notice subtler differences, such as the absence of the smart headphone jack, a smaller Click Wheel and the iPod's superflat face. Experienced iPod users may complain that essentials such as a power adaptor and A/V cables aren't bundled with the device. But despite the fact that it is an audio player first and foremost, all of you will remember the fifth-generation iPod as the video iPod.
Those who follow gadgets know that Apple didn't invent portable digital video; companies such as Archos, Creative and iRiver have produced good if not stellar products that play back video -- and on larger screens with better battery life. But if Apple can do for video what it has done for audio -- that is, deliver a hardware/software ecosystem that offers a decent choice of content and makes it easy to get video on to the iPod -- then this device, like it or not, will be remembered as the one that started the portable digital video revolution.
The fifth-gen iPod, which is available in white or nano black and comes in 30GB and 60GB capacities for £219 and £299 respectively, is the best one we've used to date. Yet because it has added a major extra feature -- video playback -- to its solid, audiocentric foundation, there's room for improvement.
Design
In this era of seemingly unstoppable technological
progress, the Apple iPod was due for an update both physically and
featurewise. And the fifth-gen iPod is much more than a simple update.
As with the nano before it, you have to see and touch the iPod in
person to appreciate it. The 30GB body, which measures 62 by 104 by
11mm and weighs only 136g (add 3mm depth and 21g for the 60GB), is
baby-soft to the touch, and while design elements such as the Click
Wheel and a polished silver backside are familiar, this iPod has an
added sexiness, thanks to the larger screen that dominates its upper
half.

Apple somehow shrunk the width of the iPod body so drastically
that the 30GB version is 31 per cent thinner than the 20GB iPod. The
60GB version measures only 14mm, meaning it too is thinner than the
20GB iPod. Personally, we think the older model, with its softer edges
and added thickness, is a tad more hand-friendly. The Click Wheel,
which utilises in-house technology (Apple has abandoned Synaptics tech,
starting with the nano), is actually smaller -- by about 8mm in
diameter -- than the fourth-gen iPod, which means you won't get as much
scrolling action with each stroke of the thumb. The select button,
which was slightly raised before, is now flat. The headphone jack has
moved to the far right, and the smart jack, which was used by a host of
accessories, such as the Apple in-line remote, has disappeared. The
hold switch has moved from right to left, while the dock connector
remains on the bottom, in the middle. Overall, the physical
design is simpler and more refined, though slightly less ergonomic.
Basically, you'll definitely get tired of holding the iPod in the 28th
minute of viewing video.



User reviews3
Add your review
Jai Shailer 8 June 2006
Good: The lovely design - sleek feel and look about it. If you are image-conscious like me, or care about the seamless music sychronisation this is a must.
Bad: The poor battery life when using video or the colour display in general.
Comment: The iTunes layout and flawless podcast and playlist simplicity for example; sends the iPod Video off with no hassle for gungeing it up wth all of your music. Innovative and stylish, this is a sure-fire from Apple.
But, on a negative 'dagger'; the battery life is called poor for a real reason.
It doesn't last long enough. :(
This should definitely be analysed and improved. A worrying prospect indeed...
Overall, if you want an ingenious and beautiful gadget that you can carry around with you with pride, purchase this!
Robin Lewis 25 April 2006
Good: Storage capacity, video/photo picture quality, battery life for audio only
Bad: Not enough bass response, battery life too short for video, scratches ARE a problem with the 5th gen
Comment: Overall I would give this a 3 had it not been for video and photo quality, which brought it up to a 4. However, there is no real point in the video feature because of the drastic decrease in battery life. Unfortunately this does not have enough bass response and in my experience (keeping it in the supplied wallet) within the first few weeks of use hairline noticeable scratches appeared over the front of the iPod and screen, which is a problem (it wouldn't have been as bad if it wasn't for the fact that it makes video viewing more annoying). Overall, don't buy this for the iPod buzz or video capabilities, buy it for the great storage capacity and good photo quality and battery life for audio ONLY, which is sufficient.
Omogbolahan Ogunnaike 22 November 2005
Good: The simplicity of downloading music onto it.
Bad: Poor battery life
Comment: Apple can do a little bit better by finding a solution to the battery.
See all 3 user reviews