This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Which phone emits the most radiation?

Is your favourite phone melting your mind or giving you cancer? According to the latest research, almost certainly not. For your peace of mind though, we looked at the radiation levels of some of the top phones in the UK and ranked them accordingly.

In order to monitor the levels of radiation we're exposed to, the government requests that all phones are tested to determine their specific absorption rate (SAR) value. The figure represents how much radiation is absorbed by the body's tissue, in Watts per kilogram (W/kg). The higher the number, the more radiation absorbed.

As inert as a well-washed pebble, and with the lowest score of our phones is the popular Samsung Galaxy S 2, with HTC's Sensation only just behind at 0.358 W/kg.

HTC's Incredible scored 0.876W/kg, outdoing the iPhone 4, which notched a relatively high rating of 1.14W/kg.

Bottom of the heap was the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro. Owners of the phone receive a tall serving of 1.61W/kg -- the highest of all the phones we've reviewed this year. This is followed very closely by the Acer beTouch E210 with 1.6W/kg.

Using a mobile poses an unknown risk of causing cancer, according to the World Health Organisation. Mobile phone use is classed as a 2B carcinogen, which sounds scary until you find out that doing carpentry or drinking coffee presents an equal risk. Basically, it might do you some harm over a long period, but no one has produced any definitive proof either way.

The max level permitted within Europe is 2.0W/kg, and the phones we've reviewed this year didn't come anywhere near that figure, so we don't think you have anything to worry about whatever phone you choose. We've listed the maximum SAR levels for each phone below. The coolest are at the top, the hottest at the bottom.

Manufacturers tend to list their phones' SAR ratings on their websites (here are the sites for Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Samsung and Motorola). When we couldn't find it on the company site we scoured the Internet for another source.

The results below are colour-coded. The SAR levels in green are from the phone manufacturers' websites, while red results are from comparison websites that list all of the phones' specs that appear on their packaging, but should be considered unofficial.

We've also included two US ratings in the table, where a European result wasn't available. Although Americans use a different radiation testing method, the results aren't incredibly dissimilar. They test phones for SAR at both head and waist height, whereas here in Europe we just test the phone at head height.

So you should take the red and US results with a pinch of salt -- they aren't the official European SAR level, so the actual rating may vary slightly.

 Phone model:
 SAR level (Watts per kg):
Samsung Galaxy S 2
 0.338
Huawei Ideos X5
 0.340
HTC Desire S 0.353
HTC Sensation
 0.358
Sony Ericsson Xperia Play
 0.360
Google Nexus S 0.395
Motorola Gleam 0.405
HTC 7 Pro 0.418
HTC Salsa 0.489
LG Optimus 3D
 0.550
Nokia E7
 0.560
INQ Cloud Touch
 0.597
Acer Liquid Metal
 0.622
Samsung Wave 2 0.988
HP Pre 3
 0.640
Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
 0.660
Samsung Solid Immerse
 0.665
Samsung Galaxy Fit 0.718
Acer Liquid Mini
 0.719
Samsung Galaxy Gio
 0.790
HTC ChaCha 0.822
HTC Desire HD 0.826
Samsung Galaxy Ace
 0.840
Motorola Atrix 0.840
HTC Incredible S
 0.876
HTC Wildfire S 0.899
Blackberry Torch 9800
 0.910
Samsung Galaxy Mini
 0.961
Samsung Wave 578 0.988
LG Optimus 2x
 1.060
LG A140
 1.080
iPhone 3GS
 1.10
Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo
 1.10
Nokia C1-02
 1.130
Blackberry Bold 9780
 1.150
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini 1.170
iPhone 4
 1.170
T-Mobile Zest 1.090
Nokia C2-01
 1.20
LG GS101
 1.20
Nokia C5-03
 1.290
LG Optimus Black
 1.30
ZTE Skate
 1.350
HP Veer
 1.380
Dell Venue Pro
 1.390
Viewsonic ViewPad 4
 1.390
HTC Gratia
 1.540
Acer beTouch E210
 1.60
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro
 1.610
Acer Iconia Smart
 Unknown or unreleased
LG Optimus Chat
 Unknown or unreleased
Viewsonic 350
 Unknown or unreleased
Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
 Unknown or unreleased
 

Update: We've added several more phones to the list in response to reader requests. We previously published the values for the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini and Mini pro under the wrong names; this has been corrected.

Comments 19

Add your comment

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 14 June, 2011 17:35

You refer to 'Xperia Mini' and 'Xperia Mini Pro' but links are to last year's X10 vers (ie not new 2011 models)
Guess the SAR ratings here apply to last year's phones (?)

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 14 June, 2011 22:06

No blackberry? :S

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 14 June, 2011 22:53

Thanks, It would be really useful if legally, this info was made more accessible when purchasing a phone. The amount of time it takes to reseach this stuff online beforehand each time is crazy.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 June, 2011 09:41

Links have been updated for the Xperia and Xperia Mini pro for this year's 'Hands-on'.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 June, 2011 10:11

check out tawkon in order to know your real time exposure to radiation (dynamic SAR values).
The SAR values reported by manufacturers are the max values which in real life might not be reached.... tawkon measures your exposure to mobile radiation constantly and alerts you when it reaches a predefined threshold, so you could use your phone wisely... !

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 27 June, 2011 07:58

O2 stores have this info on their price tickets in the shops, right next to each hand set. Very useful.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 29 September, 2011 13:25

Sorry, your data for the Samsung Wave II is incorrect. It's official SAR EU rating is 0.39 not 0.98 as you have it listed. This means the Wave II is one of the safest phones around.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 December, 2011 11:24

what about nokina n8? dooes it have high sar?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 6 March, 2012 04:20

where is Sony Ericsson Xperia mini pro ???

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 May, 2012 12:25

does anyone have the official sars rating for the galaxy s3 ?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 3 June, 2012 18:32

Samsung galaxy s iii has the lowest sar value of 0.339 W/kg. Therefore, it's one of the safest phone to use. Great phone, indeed.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 June, 2012 00:27

where is nokia 808? and all the new phones?

cnetukcnetuk's avatar

cnetukcnetuk 28 June, 2012 21:14

All the Sars ratings are on the booklet that comes with the phone, so its a bit late in the day when you find out, but, the specifications on each phone , in most cases are on the related web sites.

TheAmbience's avatar

TheAmbience 1 July, 2012 16:56

" drinking coffee presents an equal risk "
Which coffee, what brand ? how much ?
Rather than getting faster processors shouldn't the customer focused objective be to reduce the SAR level ? Samsung S2 at 0.338 as much as four times less than other mobiles.
If the radiation levels are such that it is giving people diseases then it isn't just the user, it's people on the train, on the bus. How long does that rush hour cloud linger there for everyone else to breathe ?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 September, 2012 09:55

galaxy y?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 9 December, 2012 00:49

you should do one for the 2012 phones

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 December, 2012 19:43

http://documentaryheaven.com/resonance-beings-of-frequency/
This is a very insightful documentary about the effects of cell phone radiation, and radiation in general.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 February, 2013 22:37

Can you please explain to me how the author can state in one sentence "Using a mobile poses an unknown risk of causing cancer", and then "Basically, it might do you some harm over a long period" ...and then go on to say "we don't think you have anything to worry about whatever phone you choose" ?

In one way I would agree that probably it does not make such a difference what phone you choose because they ALL present an official cancer risk.

I feel that this article tries to paint a rosy picture with regard to whether or not mobile phone use is safe. But let's face it, anything which is officially rated as a cancer risk is not safe. I think you should be advising people with regard to how to minimize these risks rather than telling them they have "nothing to worry about".

Thanks
Edward

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 March, 2013 11:00

anyone know the sar value for the Sydney?

Post your comment

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.