CNET is available in the following editions:
Read our full review
Add your review
Comment: The best:
* Elegant design and build quality
* Outstanding screen with wide viewing angle, good contrast, and brilliant colors
* Good collection of social widgets which can be expanded through extensions for additional social networks.
* Excellent performance in applications and games thanks to Sony's light launcher and adequate hardware
* Good performance of the camera, even in low light conditions
* Sony's exclusive applications do not provide any additional value compared to default applications
* Battery capacity and performance is worse than other telephones
* Hardware power is lower than other similar phones
Our full analisis Sony Xperia T: http://www.teknofilo.com/analisis-sony-xperia-t-prueba-a-fondo/
Good: Easy to use
Bad: Battery life
Comment: Having owned a Sony Erickson phone for a number of years I upgraded to a Sony Experia. While to phone is easy to use and adequate the battery life is pathetic to say the least. The phone will not last 24 hours without charge and takes about 8 hours to charge. I dont use the internet and rarely use the phone. My Sony Erickson went a week without charging. Dont buy this phone---a waste of time
Good: screen, camera, stability, small apps
Comment: I can honestly say that this is one of the better phones I have ever owned. I have an HTC one X and I have had to send it off twice because of screen burn from normal use. The S3 feels cheap and plastic despite being a good phone. The xperia T has been a reliable workhorse for me despite the limitations of the battery but they seem to be present in every smartphone. I agree that the select store being a mirror to the play store feels like a waste of time.
However the main reason I'm replying to this review is to point out to the reviewer that the iPhone 5 isn't world beating, its a reskinned Galaxy S2 with a cut screen. I will concede that it is polished but they have had 18 months to polish since Samsung launched it. No mention of the dual-core processor lacking in Apple's Opus nor of the fact that in the era of everyone else moving to universal compatibility Apple aren't even compatible with themselves which every user in the world will find a pain.
Review like a journalist not like a fanboy.
In summary the S3, One X, Nexus 4 and Xperia T are much of a muchness. The iP5 isn't bad but I would trust the guy who Steve Jobs calls an idiot if I were an apple fan and as I'm not if I wanted old tech I'd buy old tech.
Bad: camera is awful, battery is poor.
Comment: I bought one of these on the grounds of the camera and it was the flagship model, yet despite only getting it in November its been replaced as the flagship probably due to the issues which sony dont seem to care about despite their own forum being full of bad comments.
The camera has so much noise on it when viewed on a full screen and most of the time the auto focus on the video does not work.
I will never buy a sony phone again.
Good: Smooth Interface, Screen, Camera 13MP
Bad: Battery Life
Comment: This phone is great i buy it because of the camera is the best for androi phones, it is very smooth to handle, and please please it is better than the iphone 5
Good: screen resolution and clarity, msuic quality
Bad: longer battery life would be nice
Comment: I do sometimes wonder about some of the CNET reviewers. For a start screen quality for this phone is excellent. Just put it next to an S3 and compare the difference when browsing web sites! (eg the CNET site etc). The S3 screen is dull and not so sharp in comparison (have a look at web pages, or apps wiht a white background and the difference jumps out- even with putting the S3 to maximum brightness, switching off battery saving and playing with the defaults). The screen is slightly smaller than the S3 -but it has higher ppi- 342 compared to 306 for the S3). If readability is important for you then go for this!
Music quality is excellent- including the external speaker (not quite iphone 5, but less tinny than the Motorola RAZR). I prefer the 3.5 earphone socket on the top- it doesn;t get int he way (one thing I preferred on the 4S compared to the iphone 5).
Having an SD card slot is handy.
The 13mb camera is pretty good (still not quite iphone 5- but in low light conditions, providing you change the default settings, this surpasses the S3).
On the down side it does feel less comfortable to hold than the S3 with it's smooth curved sides.
Also battery life- Sony you should be doubling what you provide- ok it just about gets me through a day but compare that with the RAZR i which is smaller and easily lasts into a second day.
A nice touch is being able to move the default Google search bar to the bottom of the screen which makes it a lot more accessible (unlike on the RAZR i which although smaller, does not allow the google search bar to be moved to the bottom of the screen- and so it's more of a pain to type things in). Google- if you read this- please allow your menus to be at the bottom of the phone. For large screens typing to get to the menu bar at the top of the phone when holding it in one hand is a pain).
I thought long and hard about getting this compared to a Nexus 4 (good price and raw jelly bean- but availability issue, glass back, non expandable storage); the S3 (big screen- but the screen is just not sharp or bright enough) and the RAZR i (which is a pretty good- especially with it's waterproofing, strength and battery life).
Good: Design, Interface, size.
Bad: Camera similar to older model, battery life is meicore, etc.
Comment: I own an Xperia S and it is a great phone cheaper than Xperia T.
Xperia S has the same day to day performance of the Xperia T, the camera is almost the same and everything else too.
Why I prefer my Xperia S over Xperia T:
- Xperia S is cheaper.
- Xperia S is Adoble Flash certified.
- It also has NFC.
- More internal storage, 32 GB vs 16 GB.
- It has better battery life and standby time.
So yeah this phone isn't Sony's best, I believe Xperia S is still their best phone. :)
Good: Thankfully costs only £20/month on contract
Bad: Where do I start?
Comment: I have been a long-term Nokia user and my N8 came to the end of its contract and was getting a bit shabby round the edges so I was lulled into thinking that this was a great phone with a great camera. Coming from the N8 with symbian belle, this is a definite step backwards - the camera is shoddy and takes awful pictures, it is full of fancy features that nobody is ever likely to use, if they work at all - it took a while to work out how to use the much-vaunted NFC, and then it was disappointing as you can't transfer files, bluetooth is cumbersome, trying to set up devices just returns error messages, and so on. I have asked Orange to send me a normal-sized sim card so I can go back to a proper phone that does what it says on the tin.
Good: Good: great phone, build quality, performance, not the size of the samsung space station III
Bad: biased cnet review,
Comment: great phone, great build, faster and cheaper than samsung gsiii(£550 vs £339 payg)
Good: great phone, build quality, performance, not the size of the samsung sapace station III
Bad: Propriety Sony software
Comment: great phone
Dual core chip set out performs the GSIII
Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account
Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment
Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Sony Xperia T
Find a deal
More Mobile Phones in Crave
About CBS Interactive
Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.