Samsung D900 user reviews
18
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
Should I buy it?
Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Samsung D900
Android App 
RSS Feeds 
iPhone App 
Newsletters
User reviews18
Tim McGinty 1 December 2006
Good: Looks and number imput graphics
Bad: Camera, video playback, no personalised message tones
Comment: Great looking phone, but they've made it so thin that the slightest bit of pressure on the screen the plastic case presses on and the screen breaks, and I mean 'SLIGHTEST'. I put the phone in my pocket, went for a 5 min drive, got out out of the car, checked my phone, and it looked like the glass screen had been tapped with a hammer, yet there was no mark on the plastic. I thought it may have been my fault but I've since checked the Net and I've read several reports of this happening. No matter how sexy a phone is, it's totally useless if the screen breaks when you put it in your pocket. All in all this is 1 to AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE!
Ray Ray 21 November 2006
Good: 3.15 Megapixel camera. Sleek, glossy design
Bad: Fingerprints seen easily
Comment: Overall a good phone.
Anonymous 7 November 2006
Good: Beautiful stunning pictures created from the 3-megapixel camera - one of the best around
Bad: The memory slot, you have to buy more memory
Comment: The Samsung D900 is the slimmest slider phone in the world, at just over 1cm thick. The picture quality is perfect and creates replica digital camera images. The MP3 player booms out all your songs, and the sliding technique is smooth. Overall, a brilliant mobile phone - I'd say better than the Sony Ericsson K800i
Scott Rodaway 30 October 2006
Good: Most of it
Bad: A bit difficult to slide up
Comment: I got this as an upgrade from an E900. Tunes sound better and louder, the camera is better, and it's not as fiddly to use.
Andrew Kennedy 16 October 2006
Good: Design, video quality, ease of use
Bad: Saving photos to memory card issue, re-sizing pictures
Comment: Having upgraded from a Sony Ericsson K750i which was an amazing phone I have found that Samsung struggle to match the fluidity of use and features on the D900. I love the aesthetics of the phone, it is truly gorgeous, the camera is more than capable of delivering high quality photos and the music player is very impressive. However, the D900 is dogged by some of the memory card features being that you cannot save photos or video directly to the memory card, and say if you transfer photos from the phone to memory card and then use the image as a wallpaper it does not fill the screen.
I must say though this is not a major problem but would be good if it were fixed with a firmware upgrade. Overall, a stunning phone for people who love form and function seamlessly joined together.
Devender Dev 26 September 2006
Good: Looks
Bad: Lot of things
Comment: Poor battery life. It dies after just 2 hours of music.
Poor camera. It is 3-megapixel just for the sake of it. Pic quality is no better then 1.3-megapixel.
Poor media player. Only 4 playlists with 30 songs per playlist.
All in all... not worth the money.
Thomas Newbold 5 September 2006
Good: Very light and compact, excellent technology. Great camera, MP3 player and screen
Bad: Having to pay for the good games, having to buy a memory card to get the most from the phone. The stock headphones.
Comment: If you want a phone that is sleek and compact, the photos dont do it justice, it's amazing what they have packed into this thing, and the menus are fast and easy. The keys are fine in my opinion, certainly better than the V3. The camera is no replacement for a proper digital camera, but is amazing for catching those magic moments. With a big memory card this would make a great MP3 player: the sound is loud and crisp, but you have to buy an adaptor to use your own headphones, although these are cheap so no complaints. It may lack the camera of the Sony K800i but it's half the thickness and much better looking. All round a very stunning phone, I'm extremely pleased.
James Thompson 2 September 2006
Good: Well built, hi-res camera and screen, thin, nice graphical interface
Bad: Lack of pre-loaded media
Comment: This is a nice phone, that has all the features one would expect from a top of the range non-3G phone. The design is very sober and does not have that wow factor that the Razr does, but at the same time it's discrete and quite elegant. The photos on CNET make it look a grey-black and quite dated, but it has to be seen in the flesh.