Hot Products
Nokia E52 review
Reviewed by Frank Lewis on 7 September 2009
Verdict
It's not the most exciting handset around at the moment, but the Nokia E52 still manages to impress with its long battery life, excellent call quality and useful feature set
Good
- Long battery life
- Easy to use
- Good screen
Bad
- Poor camera
- Keypad is less than ideal for text entry
Not everyone wants a smart phone with a touchscreen and loads of entertainment features. Many people just want a device with long battery life, great call quality and a few applications to help them read and edit work documents on the move. This is the market that Nokia is aiming for with the traditional-looking E52.
It's available for about £230 SIM-free. We'll update this review with pay-monthly and pay-as-you-go prices when they become known.
Evolution, not revolution
Whereas Nokia's N-series smart phones are aimed primarily at those looking for a feature-packed but fun handset, the E series has always been targeted more towards business users. We were quite fond of the original E51, as we liked its ease of use and impressive messaging features, so, with Nokia having nearly two years to work on the follow-up, we had high expectations for the E52.
From the outset, it's clear that this update is more of an evolution than revolution. In terms of design, it doesn't stray all that far from the original E51. It retains the same tall and narrow design, with a large, square direction pad in the centre and tapered sides that frame the keypad at the bottom. The E52 is a good deal slimmer though, measuring a mere 10mm at its thickest point. It's lighter too, tipping the scales at just 98g. There are also some welcome new features, including a 3.5mm headphone jack, so you can use your own headphones, as well as a standard micro-USB port for charging and syncing with a PC.
Big, bold screen
Nokia has also done a good job on the display. Not only is it bright and capable of showing really vivid colours but it's also much larger than those found on more run-of-the-mill candybar handsets. Measuring 61mm (2.4 inches) across the diagonal, the screen has, for a phone of this size, a relatively high resolution of 320x240 pixels. As a result, it gives you a decent amount of room when you're using the phone's browser to view Web sites, or watching videos in the movie player and You Tube applications.

Connectivity is also good. The E52 is quad-band, so you'll be able to use it in most countries around the world. It also offers speedy Web browsing and downloading, as it supports both HSDPA and Wi-Fi. As well as this, there's now also on-board GPS. This works well with the pre-loaded navigator application. Alternatively, you can download Google Maps for the phone and use the GPS functionality with that. Either way, we found the phone took mere seconds to lock onto enough satellites to pinpoint our location, even from a cold start.
S60 simplicity
The handset runs Nokia's Series 60 operating system, so the menu layout will be instantly familiar to anyone who's used a recent Nokia phone. The applications and settings menus are laid out in a straightforward grid structure, making it easy to find your way around. Plus, there are plenty of useful applications pre-installed, including Quickoffice, for viewing and editing work documents. As Series 60 is well supported by developers, there's a wealth of extra apps available for download too.
On the downside, the standard mobile-phone keypad isn't ideal for tapping out emails, and the shots from the basic 3.2-megapixel camera are relatively poor by today's smart-phone standards.
Nevertheless, as you'd expect from a Nokia handset, call quality is first-rate. Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the E52, however, is its battery life. This phone has the longest battery life of any handset we've tested for quite some time. Nokia rather conservatively quotes 8 hours of talk time and 23 days on standby, but, during our test period, we got around 4 days' use out of it before it needed recharging.
Conclusion
On first sight, the Nokia E52 won't set your heart racing, since its design is rather conservative by today's standards. But, when you actually use the handset for a while, you can't help but grow fond of it. This isn't just because its battery life is exceptional. It's also very straightforward to use, while still managing to pack in all the key features you'll need on a daily basis. If you're after a smart phone that has the look and feel of a more traditional mobile, it's seriously worthy of consideration.
Edited by Charles Kloet





User reviews 9
Add your review
Celyn Jones 16 August 2010
Good: Build quality, Battery life, Price, Navigation.
Bad: Only s60v3, not the most intuative user experience.
Comment: Had an N82 until it was borrowed without permission by a sticky fingered c*@^. (read : stolen)
Went around the shops trying many phones and here's my assessment of the market in Indonesia.
HTC - Cannot get here easily (pity).
Apple - Only 3Gs available here (at a crazy price).
Samsung - Tried the Galaxy S. Great screen, but think I'll drop it too often and it's a thief magnet.
Sony - Nice cameras, but never really liked them (owned 2 already).
Blackberry - The most popular phones here (inc. my wife). However, old tech, terrible battery life and a bit too chunky for the pocket.
Motorola - Hard to find.
So that just leaves Nokia for the major brands (UK consumers consider yourself fortunate).
N97 / N97 mini - Hmmm, overpriced, poor touchscreen and interface.
New models are too plasticy and driven by fashion rather than using the latest hardware / os.
So it was down to the E72 or E52.
E72 - Sadly the qwerty buttons are too small for my fingers. (same as my wife's E71)
So I bit the bullet and bought a E52 for less than us$230.
The E52 ticks most of my boxes - Tough, Great battery life, 3.5mm headphone jack, easy wi-fi use, and free navigation without the need to use data streaming.
I know it's not really the dogs, but it does make calls / sms / surfing / Facebook / play music etc... without shouting "look at me!" or "fanboy!".
Haven't had any of the serious problems other users are experiencing, and being quite old the firmware is now mature enough to have nearly all of the bugs ironed out.
Finally, it's slim and small enough to not look like I am "pleased to see to you" when it's in my pocket.
My only real gripe is the internet browser. So many button presses to do most tasks. (c'mon Nokia release an updated version)
CNET UK's review is just about right (as usual). Thanks guys and gals.
xslavic 28 June 2010
Good: The Phone ,sound quality ,reception,battery duration,design
Bad: evene the 3 megapixel camera is not bad
Comment: Very Good phone , long battery duration, high quality voice calls,easy to use, good for messaging, ITS VERY GOOD FOR MESSAGING, not like touchscreens,good for work (handy camera)
give it a 9,5 points,the best phone i ever had
Chinese 19 June 2010
Good: The screen
Bad: Battery life, ergonomics, flimsy construction
Comment: Good: fantastic screen, high feature count, 3.5mm headphone jack, fast internet access.
Bad: astonishingly complex to do simple things (phone or text), very easy to delete a contact when making a call; appalling battery life - it will last for weeks if left in a drawer but light phone use with Bluetooth on will have it dead in 36 hours; although the buttons are most large they are at the same height and do not positively engage so it is very easy to switch to messaging in the middle of using the internet for example. Other Nokias with same layout are far more ergonomically sound. Within three months the battery cover falls off (and the battery falls out), and the key pad is partly dislodged; the surround by the mini-usb broke within days. The OS is slow and occasionally the phone freezes. Have given up with it.
See all 9 user reviews