Ad: Get our free CNET Android app

Motorola Aura review

Our rating

3.5 stars out of 5

User rating

4.5 stars out of 5

See all user reviews

What do you think?

Verdict

The Motorola Aura sports a basic 2-megapixel camera, a mediocre media player and a clunky user interface. But who cares? This handset is a stone-cold stunner

Typical price

£1,200

Good

  • Gorgeous screen
  • Groovy rotating cover with visible gears
  • Etched stainless-steel body
  • Weighty, quality feel

Bad

  • Clunky user interface
  • No full-screen video playback
  • Unpleasant Web browsing

In this review

Like Derek Zoolander, the Motorola Aura knows there's more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. But it's not sure exactly what.

The Aura is drop-dead gorgeous, thanks mostly to its stunning 16-million-colour screen, but, like many fashion phones, it falls down on features. With an equally stunning price tag of around £1,200 SIM-free, it's got its work cut out to impress us.

Pretty but dumb
The Aura looks unique and impressive. Every time we whipped it out, we heard a chorus of 'oohs' and 'aahs'. When faced with the Aura's loveliness, even the most curmudgeonly of cynics melted like they were looking at a baby kitten, having previously raised an eyebrow in doubt when they heard about 'the world's first circular screen'.

Part of the Aura's appeal lies in its hefty, 15mm-thick, etched stainless-steel body and rotating cover with exposed geared mechanism. But most of its charm is down to the screen, which is clear and amazingly vibrant, thanks to its 16 million colours, 300dpi resolution and a 62-carat sapphire-crystal lens.

But a round screen has its drawbacks. In fact, it made us realise why every other screen is square. For example, when we were taking photos on the Aura's 2-megapixel camera, the corners of the image weren't visible, which made it difficult for us to frame our snaps. After we took a photo, the Aura showed the whole rectangular image, wasting a great deal of screen real estate.

We had a similar problem when surfing the Web. Web pages are designed for rectangular screens, so the Aura letterboxes the top and bottom of its display and cuts off the corners of the page to show a wide image with rounded sides. It works, but it reminded us that the round screen is a gimmick that's all about looks rather than functionality. The Aura's okay for looking something up on Google in an emergency, for example, but not for any serious surfing.


The Aura's rotating cover has an exposed mechanism, which is pointless but awesome

But maybe we're being shape-ist bigots -- is it the Aura's fault that it's a round peg in a square world? Yes, because, even within its own user interface, which should be round-screen-friendly, there are problems.

The main menu consists of a series of icons arranged in a circle. It would probably be a pleasure to navigate the icons using a round wheel like that of an iPod. But the Aura sports a four-way navigation button, so moving around the circle requires multiple presses of the left or right directional buttons. We were frustrated when we wanted to manoeuvre to options on the opposite side of the circle because they take so long to get to.

In fact, we found the Aura's user interface click-happy throughout. For example, it took 13 steps to change the wallpaper -- something we bet we'd be doing often so we could enjoy that luscious screen. And that's if we wanted to use one of the pre-made round wallpapers -- to browse to our own photos required another four steps.

We also found the interface inconsistent and confusing. For example, when selecting a new wallpaper image, the select option's on the right function key. When choosing an option from the shortcut menu on the home screen, the select option's on the left.

Shrunken heads
The Aura sports a 2-megapixel camera, which takes bright but slightly fuzzy snaps in good light. But there's no flash or LED photo light, so shots in low light are noisy and blurry. But we were pleased to find a short lag of only a fraction of a second between pressing the shutter and taking a photo.

The Aura also shoots video, but the results were dark and dingy when we filmed indoors. We were also disappointed with the playback: videos are played in the centre of the screen in a tiny 21 by 16mm square.

Even the full-screen option doesn't expand the video to fill the round screen, although it does what it says on the tin in the case of photos. The Aura's screen is its crowning glory, and we think it should exploit that by showing all media in a big and round format by default. Otherwise, we end up looking at unspectacular photos and video on a tiny screen area -- hardly a luxury experience.

Getting sleepy
The brightness and clarity of the Aura's screen drains the battery. The Aura tries to address this by dropping into screen-saver mode within a few seconds. But, with constant use, we found the battery life to be far below Motorola's estimate of 7.3 hours of talk time and up to 400 hours of standby time. A couple of hours of ogling the screen and a night on standby drained the battery completely.

User reviews1

Add your review

swifty21's avatar
4.5 stars out of 5

swifty21 11 June 2009

Good: brilliant reception which i cannot get from my storm or htc even set on 2g , build quality, call quality

Bad: texting can be a bit of a pain until you get used to it

Comment: I purchased this phone because i cannot get any reception in my house from either a blackberry storm, htc , samsung tocco ultra even set on 2g or even a bog standard 2 g mobile, and i suffer from servere migraines , This motorola gives me 5 bars of reception whereever ever i am in the house. Yes it is lacking gadgets (but they are not worth having if you cannot make a call) The screen quality is unbelievable and you can save a picture so that it fully takes up the round screen . The build quality is excellent. I read in the other review that they found the menu circle difficult you just have to get used to the top being like 12 oclock and using the keys half way up towards it and going the other way to reach it that way. the camera even though it is 2mega is very good quality and is better than some 3-4 and even 5 mega pixal camera phones that i have had. One thing that i have found a pain is texting which takes along time to get used to, but i have now cracked it. The call quality is so clear and no hot ear. brilliant. I paid about £100 more than a htc pro 2 in the end, so it was well worth everypenny. If you want a brilliant phone, that makes clear calls that looks and feels as though it may out live you, with an amazing screen , that has reception better than none this is the phone. If you want gadets it is not the phone for you, but i have found my ideal phone. One very pleased moto customer and no i do not work or have any connection to them,

Tell us what you think

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Step 1

0 out of 5

Step 2

Submit

Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment

Should I buy it?

Motorola Aura slant

Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Motorola Aura

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2012 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.