The iPhone 4S had one of our favourite phone cameras of last year, providing shots that would give even some dedicated compact digital cameras a run for their money. Apple claims the iPhone 5's snapper has even better tech, so let's pit it against its closest smart phone rivals -- the HTC One X and the Samsung Galaxy S3 -- to see which is the serial shutterbug's smart phone du jour.
All the shots were taken on the full 8 megapixels offered by each phone, with all other settings set to automatic. All the example images below can be clicked on to view the full-sized versions.
Outdoor test
All three phones did an admirable job of tackling this outdoor scene. It's not an easy one to capture, as it combines dark areas in the buildings on the left and bright skies surrounding London's Shard.
The difficulty in properly exposing was particularly noticeable on the HTC One X and to a lesser extent on the Galaxy S3. Both cameras produced quite strongly blown-out highlights in the sky and the S3's attempt, in particular, resulted in a rather cold colour cast to the scene.
The iPhone 5, meanwhile, gave a much more even exposure overall, avoiding the blown-out clouds, while retaining plenty of detail in the buildings and pavement.
Winner: iPhone 5
HDR test
If the scene you're shooting has a strong mix of bright and dark areas and your phone can't accurately expose by itself, then try setting it to HDR mode. HDR stands for high dynamic range and combines multiple photos, each taken to expose for the bright and dark areas, which are then combined to create an even exposure overall. At least that's the theory.
All three phones offer HDR functions but the results vary considerably. I tested them using the same outdoor scene as before for easy comparison. The HTC One X's approach appeared overly processed, which resulted in a very unrealistic -- and unimpressive -- photo.
The Galaxy S3's was much better, with the previously blown-out highlights in the sky rescued, but the overall scene looking a little dull. The once white, fluffy clouds appear like a grey splodge on the skyline.
The iPhone 5 maintained the even exposure it captured without HDR, but managed to brighten up the pavement, bringing out some of the detail in brickwork and on the surrounding buildings. It also provided richer colours than the S3 and the One X. So the iPhone takes the top spot in this category.
I've also included a 'before and after' shot I took using the iPhone 5's HDR function as a reference, as I think its ability to deliver a well-balanced shot in this scene is particularly impressive. The S3's attempt at the same scene is below. I sadly wasn't able to take the shot on the HTC One X, so I'm not including this scene in the conclusion.
Here's the S3's effort, without HDR and then with.
Winner: iPhone 5
Low-light test
With their small sensors and tiny optics, phone cameras are never that great at taking low-light shots as they're unable to let in enough light to do the scene justice. If a phone is going to be your main snapper, you'll want a decent performance in low-light situations.
The iPhone 5 gave the worst performance overall. Its photo lacked detail and clarity. A large amount of image noise also crept in, which is particularly evident on the white walls.
The Galaxy S3 came second in this round, providing a sharper, cleaner image than the iPhone 5, although it again suffered from a rather cold colour cast.
The HTC One X put in the best performance, with its photo not only sharper than the others but also displaying much less image noise. It produced warmer tones than the S3.
Winner: HTC One X
Low light with flash test
If you don't want your subject shrouded in darkness when taking low-light shots, then turning the flash on is essential. All three phones boast LED flashes on the back, so let's take a look at what they can do.
Where previously the One X had excelled, it now falls to the back of the pack. Its shot not only lacks the definition offered by its rivals, but it also suffers from a huge case of blues. If you were using the flash to take a romantic picture of your significant other, I doubt they'd be too flattered by the results.
The Galaxy S3's attempt was much clearer, with sharper lines visible around each object. It too suffers from a blue hue, but it's nowhere near as bad as the One X's.
The iPhone 5 takes the prize here as its shot is not only clear and well defined, but it also provides natural, warm tones that are significantly more appealing than its two Android rivals.
Winner: iPhone 5
Panorama test
The iPhone's update to iOS 6 brought with it the ability to take panorama pictures, simply by pressing the shutter button and moving the phone from one side to the other. This feature was already present on the S3 and One X though, so let's see how the results stack up.
The HTC One X's attempt was mostly good, without too much distortion visible from the automatic stitching. There was some visible on the trees just left of the middle though, and the over-exposure of the sky was so strong that it had quite a negative effect on the edges of all the foliage.
The iPhone 5's attempt just snuck in front though, as it was almost entirely free of stitching errors and did a better job of keeping the bright sky under control.
The Galaxy S3's attempt was frankly laughable. A panorama is made up of multiple photos stitched together and it's evident that the S3's camera has re-exposed for each individual shot. It's all too clear to see how it has attempted to lower the exposure in the middle to avoid over-exposing the sky, which doesn't fit at all with the rest of the scene.
Winner: iPhone 5
Interface and features
If you want to get all arty and creative with your shots, you'll need a phone that lets you tweak the camera as much as possible.
The iPhone 5 has the most stripped-back camera interface you're likely to see on a phone. Its only customisable features are turning the HDR and panorama functions on or off. There's no option to change the image quality, scene mode or add any in-camera effects.
Both the Galaxy S3 and the HTC One X, however, add a truckload more to the mix, letting you tweak not only the resolution, but also use scene modes for better capturing action events, nighttime shots or close-up objects. It also has a bunch of filters for giving your snaps vintage tones or vignette effects.
Of course, a lot of these features can be achieved -- with perhaps better results -- with downloadable apps such as Instagram, which are available across iOS and Android. But it's certainly a helpful extra to have these settings built in as standard, so you don't have to load up a separate app.
Winner: HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy S3 -- there's very little difference between their interfaces.
Overall winner
While the iPhone 5 might not cope quite as well in low-light situation as its rivals, and its interface certainly doesn't offer the same level of customisation, it gives a stronger performance in most other areas, particularly with its HDR skills. For those reasons, the iPhone 5 takes the prize for having the best camera.




















Comments 72
Add your comment
anonymous 26 September, 2012 18:14
the low light with flash test on the iPhone picture has really UNrealistic colours, the background white, is way too bright.
anonymous 26 September, 2012 18:19
What a surprise that they give it to the metal phone with scratches. Most expert reviews ive seen say the one x has the best camera for highend smartphones but now the iphone 5 comes out and its the best lol
anonymous 26 September, 2012 18:28
I have to say what the F.U.C.K is the s3 panorama shot about hm funny how you apple i mean cnet put that S.H.I.T up what a joke
anonymous 26 September, 2012 18:39
my s3 has never had problems with stitching !!
anonymous 26 September, 2012 18:50
you may wanna check this out as well
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/26/lumia-920-low-light-shootout
anonymous 26 September, 2012 19:23
once again we see CNETs biased reporting. if you want to compare and review the top camera smartphones, why leave out Nokia Lumia 920. which according all other industry experts is the best camera smartphone. but not according to some lame CNET experts.<br />
check this link guys.<br />
thanks.
anonymous 26 September, 2012 19:25
Oh dear. Android militia on the warpath........again.
anonymous 26 September, 2012 20:10
Funny how iphone takes credit for a sony camera.
anonymous 26 September, 2012 21:15
theres some problem with my s3 camera in low light its showing more noise then its supposed to??? pls help???
anonymous 26 September, 2012 21:29
So biased
marcus_h 27 September, 2012 00:07
The iPhone may use a Sony sensor, but there are many elements needed to make the whole system work well. So no reason why they shouldn't 'take credit' (though they are not here - its CNET GIVING them credit where it is deserved)
Only the Nokia seems any match for the iP5
Ryan Simmons 27 September, 2012 03:56
You know what, fair enough. I agree with you on almost all of your points. Would perhaps give the One X / Galaxy S3 a bit more credit, but I'd agree that generally the iPhone's camera was best. The S3 panorama seems very strange though, did you try taking it again?
And for the idiots complaining about the omission of the Lumia 920: the phone hasn't even been released yet, how can Cnet be expected to properly compare it? Engadget only got shots because they were invited to Nokia's HQ in Finland and given the phone for a few days.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 07:55
Just to put all your minds to rest, android fans and apple heads, ALL THREE PHONES USE THE SONY IMX175 AND IMX145 CAMERA SENSORS. Both of which are virtually identical.
Any victor in this competition will be because of the software that accompanies the camera.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 09:11
Did you fake this or something? My S2 can take better pictures than the S3 ones you show....
This site has become such a joke in the tech world, i used to value the reviews on here when making a purchase but given the spate of rubbish that gets published on here these days i wouldn’t trust anything you 'recommend' :-(
Message to editor, if you want to save the site you still can! You have my email ;-)
anonymous 27 September, 2012 09:32
Got a lot of points to make about this test.
Outdoor:
iPhone looks too dark for me, especially in the bottom left, you can't make anything out.
Winner HTC.
HDR:
Were you moving when taking the HTC test ? Did you try again ?
Again, iPhone is too dark, you can't see any detail, it's just blackness.
Winner S3.
Low Light:
Agreed winner HTC.
With Flash:
Agreed winner iPhone, but it does look as if the S3 snap was slightly further away.
Panorama:
Again the iPhone looks too dark, you can't make out detail of the trees.
Winner HTC. I own the S3 and have never had any problems with panorama. Again, did you try again ?
There have also been many reports that the iPhone produces a purple haze when the Sun is in the picture.
Overall winner:
HTC One X.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 11:28
ok iPhone 5 rules!
anonymous 27 September, 2012 11:33
OK the Nokia Lumia 820/920 aint out yet, why not pitch all the others against the Nokia's that are, like the Lumia 800/900. Then see who comes out top.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 11:45
biased review....you put so much effort to make the iPhone 5 as the winner..i have doubt about Low light with flash test...I have ONE v and it's 5MP with flash give much better pic than how could its big brother give this kind of pic ?
anonymous 27 September, 2012 12:00
LMFAO at galexy panorama
anonymous 27 September, 2012 12:02
Intentional or not, in almost every case, the iphone had a "subject" toward the middle of the photo that the camera could latch on to for readings while the others did not get that benefit. It would have been a much truer comparison with a consistant background.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 12:17
I WAS more impressed with the detail in the HTC phone which showed less digial noise in most shot . HTC winner
samuelc 27 September, 2012 12:17
I'm a proud owner of the Samsung Galaxy S3 and a big fan of it, but just because Cnet reports that the iPhone 5 camera came out better in results doesn't mean I'm automatically going to start shouting BIASED! IT'S A FIX, THEY ARE GETTING PAID MONEY BY APPLE!
All the Android fan boys on here leaving comments really give the rest of us Android users a bad name.
I'm not a massive fan of Apple and their company ethics, far from it, but come on, just because a technology review site reviews their camera as better, you think they have a hidden agenda? What exactly do Cnet have to gain from it? They know it's going to annoy a shedload of people on the site who worship, do you think they do it on purpose?
Most of the above commenters really need to get a grip and calm down. I really like the camera on the S3, so I can cope if the iPhone 5's is better, I'm not losing any sleep over it.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 12:23
again fandroids cant accept reality :))
anonymous 27 September, 2012 12:32
Im sure the person who wrote this review is a big big big ipone freak, and he still has android dolls at his room WTF
anonymous 27 September, 2012 12:51
I would have liked a review that uses exactly the same conditions on all shots, including properly mounted phones, same light, same distance etc. each photo should include the picture properties. Doing a review like this, leaves the results open for tons of criticism.
Also, I believe this cameras are still meant for different kind of shots. I checked my phone and most pictures are of actual people, a few of signs, layouts etc. I will now go and scout the web for more professional reviews.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 13:18
then again cant accept the result, why cant accept the fact droids? why? a lot of reviews shows the fact already :)) haha
anonymous 27 September, 2012 13:27
Anyone can manipulate these tests. Intentionally poor photos of the phone you want to diss.
THIS TEST IS NOT UNDER SCIENTIFIC AND UNBIASED CONDITIONS
LOL !!
anonymous 27 September, 2012 14:00
Come on guys my galaxy s2 takes better photos that the icrap 5. Stop accepting money from Apple. All apples do is give ya gas. Every comparison done by other companies has ended up even or with the galaxy slightly ahead. You guys are one track minded. Give it up!
anonymous 27 September, 2012 14:26
Iphone 5, really? One X looks incredible and real.
brutallica 27 September, 2012 14:47
Come on cnet I have a GS3 n I don't take those horrendous panoramic pictures, like I said before o think Cnet-tv is owned by Apple
anonymous 27 September, 2012 15:17
Blatant Samsung smear article is blatant. I know this because I've taken wildly superior panoramas with a Nexus S, running Ice Cream Sandwich! Are you saying the S3 is outperformed by two gen old mid-market hardware, running one gen old software?
Oh, and giving HTC some props for credibility's sake was a nice touch.
anonymous 27 September, 2012 15:43
@samuelc
exactly. thank you
I love android, have a S2..will probably upgrade to a S3,Note2 because i feel its awesome in so many other ways..
But I accept the one x camera is better in some situations and the iphone5 beats it in almost all (shutter speed, focus speed, lagtime etc was not tested though)
People just shouting 'bias' at cnet because they are not happy with the results. Did you see their iphone5 review....and all the negative articles about apple problems they post...probably the highest in proportion to other mainstream sites.
They can't help it if the pictures came out better on the iphone5. checkout engadget's article for even more obvious pics.
The article before this one is labelled 'Black iPhone 5 damage is 'normal' says Apple's Phil Schiller' with a video showing how vulnerable this 'premium priced' product is.
It happened a while ago but I have only just realised ... android fanboys are the same as apple fanboys...*sigh*
anonymous 27 September, 2012 15:43
the camera on the iPhone 5 really is something special, and this tests proves it.
brilliant bit of kit.
mansoor_ 27 September, 2012 17:13
as an s3 owner
clearly the htc is in a class of its own
but the review is ridiculously biased
come on cnet get it together.
arphone1 27 September, 2012 21:51
I tend to agree with the review. I had a One X and the camera was very good (shame about the battery life). I've used the iphone 5 for taking quite a few photos now and I'd say it's noticeably better than the 4S. The S3 isn't bad but not as good as the One X nor the iphone 5. But the Nokia N8 (getting a bit old now) still takes better photos than any of these (shame about the software).
anonymous 27 September, 2012 23:21
Stupid Cnet made fun of S3 Panorama, I have S3 and never had this problem with it, I have taken more than 50 at least.
All other comparisons should be false as well.
anonymous 28 September, 2012 14:02
no way the panorama for the S3 is not right, my friend owns one and she has taken a better shot than that, OK you need to try that shot again.
anonymous 28 September, 2012 14:08
The flash on the iphone 5 has a syncing issue. The flash fires OK however, I end up with a under exposed image. Having searched the web, it seems I'm not the only one with this problem.
anonymous 30 September, 2012 18:59
I have to admit, I'm rather miffed by this report. You are knocking the HTC on the HDR picture yet its done what its meant to do by making the picture look as light as possible. The others but more the iphone picture just look too dark. I think you now need to link in a expert websites findings because I'm very sure that you will find you are very much wrong in your findings.
1000125626 1 October, 2012 16:47
Oh what fun...
All photography is SUBJECTIVE! To my point of view some of the ip5 pics are to dark or to bright. As already stated some photos had a subject n others were taken with some considerable time difference.
Plus there was no base photo from a decent camera, so no true comparison.
If your going to compare then u need to set base standard for it to work.
anonymous 1 October, 2012 18:15
I have a S3, have taken loads of photos and the results posted here for the S3 don't match the results I am getting. Would be really interested to know the settings that were used for each photo as it could make a huge difference. And I am not referring to auto mode as the camera is effectively auto - however some items have to be chose like matrix metering/spot etc - and that can make a major difference.
anonymous 1 October, 2012 20:16
Ok now I can see the difference but what about the Nokia 920 when it arrives it could beat those beasts ?
Ho Man 1 October, 2012 23:17
The Lumia 920 has the better camerafor al stills as well as any video.
dorix 2 October, 2012 07:45
Nobody has even dare mention THE Nokia cameraphone,which is on the market now.And it's surprising the amount of people who have never even heard of the 808 Pureview. If you haven't heard of it just Google it.Then go on the ' Pureview Club' site and take a look at some photos,videos and go to the many UNbiased reviews. I'll say no more.
anonymous 2 October, 2012 08:07
IPHONE 5 purple haze problem! What a crappy device.
anonymous 2 October, 2012 15:33
So, the iPhone 5 has the very best camera of all smartphones! I knew that before.
Android-Fanboys, get over it!
anonymous 2 October, 2012 15:36
the low light with flash test is very clearly and by far very best on the iPhone 5, everyone can see that!
anonymous 2 October, 2012 15:39
Look at the cars at the image taken by the One X: absolutely crappy!
anonymous 2 October, 2012 22:12
Well, I see the camera shootout on other websites like Mashable etc. And I noticed two obvious things:
1. iPhone 5 wins
2. Fandroids can't get over it and says "unfair comparison" different angle" "different time" etc etc.
Oh dear... Please... Get over it :)
anonymous 4 October, 2012 01:49
Sure, the iPhone 5 wins all camera tests. Do you believe this yourself ?
The iPhone 5 has a design flaw which causes purple distortion on pictures with high intensity lighting (like the sun).
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/121002030313-iphone-5-purple-story-top.jpg
Apple probably offered free iPhones for the crew of cnet.co.uk for posting these kind of lies.
anonymous 5 October, 2012 11:28
The photos with HDR and without HDR have the same EXACT scene, which means you either have two of each phone, snapping simultaneously from the same exact point, or you were able to snap, switch to HDR, and snap again within a few microseconds. Or, of course, the pictures were just edited.
I take it the pictures were edited, and that this is a sponsored post (sponsored by Apple).
anonymous 5 October, 2012 12:11
All pictures taken with Samsung Galaxy S3 phones have exif data that marks them clearly as taken with SAMSUNG device with a model I9300 (if you are using international version). None of these pictures have any such exif data. This either means the pictures were not taken with a Samsung phone or they were passed through an image editing software that stripped the exif data.
anonymous 5 October, 2012 23:43
how funny you guys are. EVERYTHING IS FAKE you just want people to buy the iphone and you will get the comission
anonymous 7 October, 2012 07:53
Amazing how Apple fans turn a blind eye to a bad product and slave labor all for the love of a company who started by stealing.
Why would Apple bother to QA check when Apple fans blindly throw money at them because it says Apple on it.
If they took a turd in a box and put Apple on it I bet these people would buy it.. Oh wait that already has happened with the Iphone 5
anonymous 8 October, 2012 21:43
As for the review. They all look crap. If you fancy taking photos buy a camera. Cameras on phones are for emergency use only!
anonymous 8 October, 2012 23:08
As an android user it saddens me to see butt hurt android fan-boys in articles like this, mainly the Samsung users...Accusing cnet of bias towards Apple is preposterous, if you read their phone reviews you can tell many of the writers are android users themselves. If you think one phone champions all fields you're sadly mistaken. And why would they include Nokia phones? this is looking at what are considered to be the best phones out at the moment, Nokia isnt yet part of this seeing as the 920 is yet to be released. Ignorance in these comments annoys me
anonymous 9 October, 2012 03:50
Talking about iPhone 5 camera and not mentioning the purple haze it produces?
Hilarious, hahaha.
The purple haze alone will distract me from that phone, not to mention ......
anonymous 9 October, 2012 14:00
Fake results and delete user comments? Is that how you operate?
anonymous 14 October, 2012 21:28
I checked almost all site reviews and checked the photos in all these camera for real, I find that most of the times iPhone camera is better.
I think the android fanboys shud learn to accept. I accept that the purple haze issue is more pronounced in iPhone 5 thats true....
anonymous 19 October, 2012 14:01
Don't forget the green screen glow and purple picture fringing makes the i5 much more colourful
anonymous 23 October, 2012 05:43
Huh, Iphone 5 camera is no where superior to either HTC One X or Samsung Galaxy SIII, in fact, if you talk about image, there is very hard to defined the actual winner, but Iphone 5 blur camera is clearly the loser here. Please don't argue even once on camera. i got the Iphone 5 and I dare to say the camera of Iphoen 5 is a disaster, as its color is completely washed out, not enough saturation and dammit still not clear enough. Enough with the stupid head to head review, people want something that could delivered vibrant, clear image on a phone, and celarly HTC One X is the one dilevering the job, Samsung GSIII camera is not its edge, but its other spec stomp the Iphone 5. I don't know what happen to Apple, but this is clearly a major mistake!
anonymous 26 October, 2012 15:47
my son has the One X and I the 4S. I am extremely impressed with his phones pictures....I wouldnt say they are better than my iphone 4s....but I would like to use his camera and see how much better I can get my pics....
anonymous 27 October, 2012 15:16
Nokia users ... Shut d f*** up :D wen they cant get a good low end camera what r they gonna get a high end camera :D ... Pureview ... Or 920 ... all of dem have crappy cameras:P
Nd its a comparision between d above mentioned phones only ... So I Phone 5 comes out to be d best as always ... Y r S3 nd One X users jealous ... D facts remain as facts ... Dont act like stupids wen u cant get an I Phone for d first place :D :D
D only competetion given to i Phone 5 is by a Sony Camera ... Comsider d Sony Xperia Ion, Xperia SL or the latest Xperia T .... :) I Phone 5 Has only one competitor .. The Sony Xperia Series :D :D
anonymous 29 October, 2012 11:19
Another apple fanboy ! RETARD! STICK AN APPLE UP YOUR ASS WILLYA! ARE YOU BLOWING TIM COOKTOO! AHH I KNOW!
anonymous 8 November, 2012 02:58
Seems like writer has I phone5!!! Sir go home and sleep nobody cares! If you want beter camera go buy canon rebel series....iphone my ass!!!
anonymous 12 November, 2012 02:04
iPhone 5 rocks all others suck!
anonymous 14 November, 2012 03:36
If it wasn't for Samsung your Iphone would sick even worse then Samsung still allows it to. The A6 is a joke!
anonymous 20 November, 2012 07:15
As i own HTC One X and i must say it's camera quality is amazing and much clear.i like it...:)
anonymous 5 December, 2012 06:13
This is the most biased tech site in the world (favoring Apple products). This is the last time I'm visiting this crap site...
anonymous 19 December, 2012 02:14
Ok guys take in to account the fact that apple is concentrating all efforts on their phone and tablet beating all others, their laptops are going down hill seriously Microsoft does so much better for less, iphone make a mockery of computer technology and actually the htc one x and xl boast 1.7ghz possessors i know a guy who helped design them. Their will be updates to the android system on the way and the xl has 4g and its camera has barley changed and seriously cameras should not be based on pixels in phones its the possessors that define the pic and htc outmatches iphone look at the god dame pics contrary to what they say the evidence is right there and yes they are bias because of the moving van. and regarding the possessors apparent step down the xl has better quality for speed and has the option to update and has larger storage. regards apple let them get on with it because their tech will only go so far without Microsoft tech. p.s apple couldn't even design its on os until recently their first one was designed by Microsoft and brought by apple because they failed to get their to work also apple software is all integrated and non up-datable (to make money) that all they care about Mr Gates however has too much and is happy to let his company work at a steady speed which i must say beats the rush of apple. in my opinion htc will win the battle anyone who has Microsoft and Sony on their side will win. I would bet in the next ten years if apple keep hasting Microsoft they will be brought out as their worth about a 5th of gates empire.
anonymous 25 February, 2013 22:40
Fuccking apple pimple
anonymous 26 March, 2013 00:03
The thing you can clearly see in EVERY picture but was only brought to attention in ONE was the clarity and detail, you can see the iphone 5 suffers on almost (if not every) picture taken yet only once was it brought to attention in the low light without the flash, way too easy to tell the reviewer favors Apple and is biest.