We've conducted an informal poll on the streets of a major city, and from that vantage point, it looks like 80 per cent of iPod-toting denizens are using the pathetic earbuds that came with their players. Shure and Etymotic's in-ear headphones are surefire cures for the bad-sound blues, but their teensy in-ear models all come with hefty price tags, with the very cheapest starting at around £60.
Sennheiser saw an opening and introduced this nifty £30 in-ear model, the CX 300, which you can actually find for around £20 online. The Sennheiser CX 300's construction quality exceeds that of most earbuds, and the soft and flexible Y cable is a good length at 1.2m. The CX 300 -- available in black or silver finishes -- doesn't come with the usual accessories, such as a travel pouch or an airline plug-in adaptor, that you get with the higher-priced models.
Like all the in-ear phones we've tested, the Sennheiser CX 300 won't produce any bass at all unless its soft silicon ear tips form an airtight seal inside your ear canals. That might require some experimentation, having to switch between the CX 300's three sizes of ear tips. We settled on the largest ones, but the fit was never as secure as we've achieved with other in-ear 'phones, and a slight tug on the CX 300's cables would dislodge the earpiece from the ear.
To evaluate the CX 300's noise isolation, we took a trip on a rattly train, where the CX 300 proved itself to be an effective noise blocker, almost on a par with the higher-priced in-ear models. The isolation won't make them a safe choice for joggers, plus we heard a significant amount of rustling from the CX 300's wires rubbing against our clothing whenever we moved about.
We directly compared the Sennheiser CX 300 to Etymotic's ER-6i (£70) in-ear headphones and came away impressed with the little Sennheisers. Firstly, the CX 300's bass went as deep as the ER-6i's, but the vocals and guitars on Ryan Adams's mostly acoustic album 29, were noticeably less 'canned' and hollow-sounding on the ER-6i. The CX 300 rocked out with a live version of the Rolling Stones's Start Me Up, and the band's power and grit were all there -- the headphones definitely played loud enough when paired with our iPod.
Sennheiser's off to a good start, but the CX 300's sound is nowhere as clear and open as that of our favourite Shure and Etymotic models.
Edited by Jasmine France
Additional editing by Nick Hide
Android App 
RSS Feeds 
iPhone App 
Newsletters
User reviews8
Add your review
lancsDavid 30 January 2011
Good: sound quality is good
Bad: like pingK says, build quality is v poor (least in my experience)
Comment: i've had 2 pairs of these. neither've lasted more than a few months
won't be buying them again
(am talking about CX 300-II's by the way)
Amit Tailor 15 January 2011
Good: Deep bass, price, durability, comfort, easy to drive, block out external sound
Bad: You can hear the cable being touched, but you get used to it quickly
Comment: I've had these for about two years and use them everyday. I love their deep bass and comfort. The best £18 I've spent! Have also bought them for someone else. Will probably buy the CX300 II when these wear out.
Alex Wilson 4 August 2010
Good: Bass is superb. Bass, mids and treble are seperate functions. Cheap. Noise isolation is AMAZING.
Bad: CNET reviewer didn't review them right. Sometimes noise from cable, when brushing against clothes, can be slightly irritating
Comment: My review is actually about the Sennheiser CX-300-II (which, exasperatingly, have not been reviewed here, yet *taps foot) - What HiFi gave these 5 stars - which is exactly what they deserve! It's really irratating when people boo-hoo these headphones (again the Sennheiser CX-300-II's) when they don't know anything about sound. Listen to Lil Wayne's 'Tha Carter III' on these and you will hear the full range of the bass - which is incredible, at this price. I'll admit the treble could be, slightly, more dynamic - but again - the price. You should hire me for these reviews - this guy is a myopic moron.
See all 8 user reviews