Many high-end headphone manufacturers like to portray their designs as 'professional' models, but that's exactly what the AKG K 702 headphones are. These new pro headphones bear a striking resemblance to the company's K 701 consumer headphones, except the new model sports 'features demanded by recording and broadcast engineers in a deluxe professional package'.
The 702 headphones are available for around £260.
Design
The 702s are nearly identical to the 701s, differing only in finish and the headphone cable. The 701s are glossy white, while the 702s offer a dark blue finish (although it looks black to us) that's said to be more durable. Also, in the case of the 702s, the 3m cable is detachable, which is a good idea, mostly because it eases the service problems that often arise from pro headphones being knocked around more than consumer models. The cable attaches to the headphone via a locking, three-pin connector. The other end terminates in a gold-plated 3.5mm stereo plug (a gold-plated, screw-on 6.3mm adaptor is also included).
Far from portable, the 702s are very large over-the-ear headphones, with extra-soft velour-covered cushions. The leather and metal wire headband distributes the weight of the 'phones evenly across your head, which means you can wear these headphones for hours at a time and they'll remain comfortable. The 702s are hand-assembled and tested in Austria, which shows in that build quality, fit, finish and durability are all first-rate. But AKG doesn't include a storage case in the package -- an oversight in this price range.
Performance
On the technical side, the 702s feature flat-wire voice coils to maintain low distortion levels, even during high-volume listening. AKG claims its patented Laminate Varimotion diaphragms allow the 702s to produce out-of-head imaging, and we agree. These headphones really deliver on that front: depending on the quality of the recording you're listening to, the sound appears to come from further away than it does with most headphones.

We plugged the 702s into an Onkyo TX-SR805 for most of our home-listening tests and compared the cans with our Grado Reference RS1 headphones. Both are excellent, but it was readily apparent that the 702s sounded more speaker-like. Norah Jones' vocal and piano on her Come Away With Me CD seemed to come from outside the headphones -- we even had to check to make sure the speakers weren't accidentally turned on. The RS1s sounded closer and more immediate, and the piano's transient attack was more life-like. By contrast, the K702s put the piano further away. The clarity was extraordinarily good, and never aggressive or thin.
AKG engineers have given the 702s the perfect balance of resolution and smoothness. The 702s' pillowy ear cushions are also far more comfortable than the RS1s' harder foam cushions, which rest directly on the ears.
Next, we watched a few movies, and the 702s' spatial qualities came to the fore. On the Mad Men: Season 1 Blu-ray, the sound of the large offices, with dozens of IBM typewriters clacking in the distance, was especially convincing. We could even hear the murmured conversations of executives behind closed office doors.
The RS1s' bass went a little deeper and made more impact in the House of Flying Daggers DVD's circle of drums scene. That is, the drums were more realistic sounding with the RS1s, although the 702s' bass and dynamics were still quite good. Again, we preferred the 702s for their open, spacious sound, which is even more evident with movies than it is with music.

User reviews2
Add your review
anonymous 4 January 2010
Good: Style, Build, Comfort, Clarity Of Sound.
Bad: Treble can be a little brittle on certain tracks.
Comment: The first impression one gets of these headphones is of a well built product with great retro styling , they ooze class. When you put them on you immediately feel the comfort with no undue pressure and a nice soft velour ear cushion that holds them firmly in place.
Then you come to the sound and here I have got to say I was initially disappointed. Compared to my UltimatEar super fi 10's it seemed thin and uninspiring although there was great clarity. It was also more remote but not ever , as some reviewers have claimed , to be confused with speakers. That idea is laughable but I suppose if you earn money writing reviews you are tempted to dip into the realms of fiction.
The superb clarity can lead to problems, I noticed some sibilance on Katie Melua's album Piece by Piece which previously had gone blissfully unnoticed and Kate Bush's Running Up That Hill can sound brittle.
My initial disappointment with the AKG has been replaced by a growing bond after many listening hours and now the Ultimatears sound indistinct and have an unsatisfying lack of clarity in comparison.The precision of the AKG's is supreme.
I did a week long comparison of the AKG K702 against the Sennheiser 650, at home with my own music. At first I was seduced by the Senn's warmer tones but then I played Jack Johnson's Bushfire fairy tales and the Senns murdered it ! The music is largely light vocals accompanied by acoustic guitar. The Senns made it muddy and dull. It was so marked that I thought my source was to blame. However swapping to the AKG's restored Jack to his excellent best.
I t was obvious that the Senns have been tweaked to give extra bass but this can colour and ,in some cases, ruin the whole track or indeed album. If I hadn't heard it myself I would have found it difficult to comprehend such poor a rendering coming from a headphone I had previously liked
I have mentioned that I am liking the AkG more and more. Some would attribute that to burn/break in with use but I am not sure I go along with that concept. I think I have adapted more than the headphones, but whatever the reason, I now love my AKG's and would defiantly recommend them.
Would I change anything ? Well yes , if I could remove that brittleness and tendency to sibilance on some tracks I would but only if it could be done without affecting the crystal clarity and detail that are the hallmark of these great headphones. The Senns did reduce the offending fragility but the smear of mud was too high a price to pay.
If you are considering the AKG then go for it, allow time to adjust and then really enjoy your music in all it's detail. One note is that these take some driving so are probably best not used with a portable player without extra amplification. That's where my Ultimateears come in.
Juan Miguel Barron 5 June 2009
Good: Natural sound
Bad: White colour
Comment: I have got a pair of AKG Reference Headphones K701 and a pair of AKG K1000. The K701, similar to the K702 but with a white finish, has the most natural and atmospheric sound I haver ever listened, better than my Sennheiser 600 and 650. I use a Musical Fidelity amplifier (X-CAN v3) but with my Onkyo Compact Disc Player DX-7555 the sound is as good as with the X-CAN or even superior.
See all 2 user reviews