Typical price: £200
What is it: Wireless music streaming centre
What we think: Capable of playing tracks from online music stores, but its wireless performance left us wanting more
What you need to know
Reviewed on: 1 June 2005
Tags: D-Link, D-Link MediaLounge DSM-320, power button, music files, plastic
We like:
Affordable; streams music, photos and video; compatible with DRM WMA files downloaded from online music stores; works with Windows Media Connect server; component-video output; optical and coaxial digital audio outputs
We don't like:
Finicky wireless connectivity with non-D-Link routers; lacks front-panel display and controls; doesn't display album artwork; not compatible with files purchased from iTunes Music Store; not Mac compatible
CNET UK judgement:
It's one of the first digital media receivers capable of playing tracks purchased from online music stores, but the DSM-320's wireless performance left us wanting more
Full review:
Fresh off the heels of a major upgrade, D-Link's MediaLounge DSM-320 is among the first digital-media receivers capable of wirelessly streaming rights-managed (DRM) audio files, such as those purchased from Napster, from your PC to your home stereo. Like many other digital media receivers, the DSM-320 (around £150 online) also plays video and image files. Continue Reading...
Latest user reviews
Do you own this product? What do you think of it?
Tell us what you think
Can't find the product you're looking for? Want to suggest a product for review?

Special Offers from our Sponsors
Latest MP3 player Reviews
Archos 5 Internet Tablet
Has an impressive range of features, but its unresponsive touchscreen is annoying
Philips GoGear Muse
Good format support and a slick design can't make up for a poor screen and laborious user interface
Apple iPod shuffle (September '09, 3rd gen, 4GB)
Its small size is impressive, but makes it trickier to use than rival devices
on MP3 & Digital Music
MySpace Music stumbles into the UK: Eugh
MySpace Music launched in the UK today, and we just don't get it. Not only is it ludicrously late to the party, it's just horrible to use
More:







