Typical price: £249
What is it: Ultracompact digital camera with 3x optical zoom
What we think: It shoehorns a relatively broad set of features, solid performance and great image quality into an attractive ultracompact package
Canon Digital IXUS 65 Review
Reviewed on: 21 April 2006
In addition to standard automatic and manual exposure modes, the IXUS 65 offers a handful of scene modes. Besides the standard night-time and portrait presets, you'll find options for photographing beaches, plants, snowy days and fireworks. It even has an underwater mode to use in conjunction with the optional underwater housing. Color Accent and Color Swap modes can filter and change colours in the camera, producing smart artistic effects. Combine the camera's 30fps VGA movie capture with the Color Accent modes, shoot a red balloon against an otherwise monochrome scene, add some voice-overs in French, and you'll be on your way to Cannes in no time.Performance
In most cases, the Canon Digital IXUS 65's performance feels quick. After taking about 1.4 seconds from power-on to first shot, the camera takes a respectable 1.9 seconds between shots, which increases marginally with flash. Its modest 0.6-second shutter lag holds for both bright scenes and dim ones. Its burst shooting zips along at 2.1fps with no buffer constraint on the number of shots.
Image quality
The IXUS 65's photos were pleasing, especially in the low-ISO ranges. At ISO 80, shots look crisp and clear with very little fringing and solid colour reproduction. Images predictably become noisy at ISO 400 and ISO 800, but it isn't so apparent as to render the photo unusable.
The Canon Digital IXUS 65 is an extremely solid ultracompact, with performance and photo quality that more than make up for its few design flaws. It's a surprisingly good shooter, and its feature set makes it quite flexible for a camera of its size. That said, it's basically a more expensive version of the IXUS 60 with a larger screen and no optical viewfinder. If you're willing to give up the big LCD, the IXUS 60 would be a more economical choice.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
|
|
Typical shot-to-shot time |
|
Time to first shot |
|
Shutter lag (typical) |
Typical continuous-shooting speed in frames per second
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|
|
Typical continuous-shooting speed |
Edited by Lori Grunin
Additional editing by Kate Macefield
Tell us what you think
Do you own this product? Want to share your experiences with other CNET UK users?
Write your own review of the Canon Digital IXUS 65
Can't find the product you're looking for? Want to suggest a product for review?
Special Offers from our Sponsors
Latest Digital camera Reviews
Canon EOS 7D
It's got flaws, but the 7D moves the goalposts so far that competitors will need binoculars
Canon Digital IXUS 200 IS
Ticks numerous boxes, but it's not especially cheap and not particularly exciting
Canon PowerShot S90
The S90 is the enthusiast's dream, offering compactness, great image quality and superb controls
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX550
Disappointing. The hybrid touchscreen interface is lacklustre overall, and the lens isn't that good
on Digital Cameras
Olympus E-P2: How's the view? Electronic, expensive
Olympus has announced the E-P2, the second retro-styled Micro Four Thirds camera in the Pen range
More:







