Sigma is still better known for its lenses than its cameras. The SD15 digital SLR, an update of 2006's SD14, was announced almost two years ago. But it has only just made it to market, at a body-only price of around £800, which is usually the kind of news that sets alarm bells ringing.
Strange goings-on
Another unusual aspect of this camera is its manufacturer's continued deployment of a 14-megapixel Foveon X3 CMOS sensor, which captures colour in a different way to conventional chips.
The SD15's feature set also feels curiously old-fashioned: there's no live view feature, allowing the 76mm (3-inch), 460,000-dot LCD screen to be used for shot composition; there's no video-capture capability; and there's no HDMI output either. Furthermore, although you can shoot JPEGs alongside raw images, you can't capture both in tandem.

As a concession to modernity, Sigma has adopted SD and SDHC cards as its storage media of choice, and overhauled the user interface to make it more user-friendly. The dedicated 'quick set' button proves a godsend, allowing compression levels, white balance, picture settings and colour modes to be rapidly tweaked on the fly, without you having to delve into the more expansive menu screens.
That said, there isn't the usual array of point-and-shoot auto and scene modes crammed around the shooting dial -- just the creative quartet of program, shutter priority, aperture priority and manual. Thus the dial itself looks rather sparse -- incomplete, even.
This is perhaps because Sigma has provided a second drive dial, which, unusually, doubles up as the power switch, on the other side of the camera. You use this dial to swap between single shots and continuous capture (up to 3 frames per second for up to 21 raw files), 2- and 10-second self-timer options, mirror-up and auto-bracketing functions.
Get to the point
The SD15 offers a five-point autofocus system. That's not a patch on the 51-point offerings to be found among Nikon's semi-professional dSLRs. In fact, it's closer to the sort of spec you'd find at the entry-level end of the market. Unsurprisingly then, busier scenes can confuse the AF, and we often found the camera had chosen to focus on the background rather than the intended subject.

Like its predecessors, the SD15 is a chunky, semi-professional beast with a dust-protected lens mount. At a body-only weight of 680g, it feels like it will withstand a few knocks with ease. Sigma boasts that its shutter is similarly durable, and can be used over 100,000 times. The camera's tank-like looks and brick-like weight, with the lens added, won't be to everyone's tastes.
Sensor and sensitivity
The Foveon X3 sensor is both this dSLR's main selling point and its Achilles heel. Sigma claims its triple-layered composition -- one silicon-embedded layer of photo detectors each for red, green and blue -- delivers more accurate colour reproduction, and, therefore, more life-like results.
That's a big claim, especially since, when you open up a fine-compression-level JPEG in Photoshop, the actual pixel count is closer to a mere 4.6 megapixels (the headline resolution divided by three -- one for each of those aforementioned layers).

The camera costs around £800 for the body only, and adding the two lenses that we had in for testing, a 24-70mm f/2.8 macro and stabilised 70-300mm f/4-5.6 zoom lens, will bring the total to nearly £1,600. That will leave some people feeling distinctly short-changed.
The SD15's battery life is good for around 500 shots, which is what we'd expect at this level. Light-sensitivity settings stretch from ISO 100 up to ISO 1,600, which feels modest. They can, however, be 'extended', via the camera's menus, to an equivalent ISO 50 and ISO 3,200. You might wish you hadn't bothered, though, as, over ISO 800, the results from the SD15 are alarmingly noisy.
The camera comes into its own when photographing still-life arrangements, portraits and nature scenes in better light. The subtleties of differing colour tones are then brought to the fore, and will almost certainly please fine-art photographers.
Verdict
The Sigma SD15 couldn't be described as a good-value all-round dSLR. If that's what you're in the market for, then look elsewhere -- at the Pentax K-7 to give but one example. Ultimately, the SD15 is a specialist tool that seems to lack a clear identity.
Edited by Charles Kloet

User reviews4
Add your review
Marlen Karakushi 19 February 2012
Comment: hi folks im a very fan of sigma becuse is japanese & they are very serius of making stuf . since i see your rewiews here i wanted to ask if the sigma UC ZOOM lens 70-210mm 1:4-5.6 of older film sigma SA-300 are compatible with sd14/ or sd15 ???
any help i apresciate very very mutch
photogenius_uk 2 January 2011
Good: User revirews
Bad: Expert reviews
Comment: I am confused ! How can the difference between the expert reviews and user reviews differ to the extremes you show??? I would like to actually have an image (of highest resolution) to actually see for myself who is correct - the two opposite views cannot both be right! Anybody feel like taking the trouble to send me the highest possible quality image for me to get the real low-down and make my own mind up? I'd be very grateful?
Edward Garcia 6 September 2010
Good: It's hyper-realistic photo output
Bad: It doesn't try to appeal to lazy photographers
Comment: The Sigma SD15 is not a camera for everyone. It's not geared towards the causal shooter that needs preset menus with icons featuring babies, fireworks, mountains, face, face with star behind it, etc.
The Sigma SD15 would be best described as a digital film camera. It is meant to be shot in Raw format. When used only to shoot jpegs, there is nothing really special about it. Just a normal digital picture, not distinguishable from the countless other cameras out there. When used as intended by Sigma for Raw, then you can see what you spent your money on.
The amount of detail and clarity is incredible. Raw on Sigma is truly high definition photography. It can capture the "peach fuzz" on sunflower stems. It can pick up individual eyelashes and let you count them if you are so inclined.
I don't understand why reviews focus on features that really have no point on a photo camera. So it doesn't do video? From what I have read, video from digital cameras never really gets good marks anyways. The reviewers always say you should buy a camcorder if you want to shoot good video. It doesn't have live view? Last I checked my 15 came with a viewfinder. How much more "live" than that do you need? I doubt Ansel Adams switched his 4x5 to live view to capture El Capitan. By the time you're done composing on a screen, you probably missed your picture. Spotty autofocus? The Leica M9 at 7000$ body only doesn't even have have auto focus period! Or video, or birthday cake options.
What you get when you purchase a Sigma camera is a unique photographic tool that produces stunning images provided you know how to operate a manual camera. You have to do the work. You have to make an effort and therefore are rewarded with an image that exceeds conventional digital images.
You can easily enlarge the Raw files to 11x4 with no loss of quality. How people enlarge over 4x6 in the first place? If you're going to make wallpaper rolls out of your images, the you know you need different software to enlarge to such proportions.
The screen works fine to show you what you shot and that's it. Nobody does post production on camera. You import it to your computer and fix your images.
Also, why does it need to shoot both Raw and jpeg at the same time? Isn't it the same image just times two?
Personally, I think it's a genius camera. It does what I need it to do. It takes amazing pictures.
I think if this camera was reviewed under the terms it was meant to be used on it would have a much higher score.
See all 4 user reviews