Performance
As
for performance, the 40D is reasonably speedy for its class, and
roughly 20 per cent faster overall than the 30D. But it still can't
keep up with the faster, albeit lower-resolution, D80. From a cold
start to first shot takes only 0.3 seconds and under optimal conditions
it can focus and shoot in only 0.4 seconds. A healthy buffer and fast
card writes allows the 40D to maintain that pace from shot to shot for
both JPEG and raw. Flash recycle time adds slightly less than 0.2
seconds to that.

The 40D has slow- and high-speed burst modes which test out at 3.1 frames per second (fps) and 6.3fps, respectively; the slower mode is for preventing buffer lockups when using a slow CF card. We also found the slower mode a useful speed option when shooting with the Speedlite 580EX flash with sluggishly recycling alkaline batteries. Note that in the case of the 40D a 'slow' CF card does not mean 'anything slower than UDMA'. It doesn't support UDMA, and seems to have sufficient buffer to maintain maximum throughput even with a last-generation SanDisk Extreme III (133x) card.
However, the camera does hit one sour performance note: leisurely low-contrast focusing, which ratchets up low-light lag to 1.2 seconds. This is despite Canon's claim of a 30 per cent increase in AF calculation speed. Though not uncommon for a dSLR, we really expect better, especially for this price class. Canon rates the battery, the same 1,390mAH BP-511A used by the 30D, at 1,100 shots (sans flash). Though this is reasonably long, Canon lags behind many of the other manufacturers for providing intelligent power display and estimates of power remaining. The large, bright LCD is easy to view, but like even the best camera LCDs, it renders relatively poor representations of colour and exposure.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
| Time to first shot | |
Raw shot-to-shot time | |
Shutter lag (dim light) | |
Shutter lag (typical) | |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
User reviews2
Add your review
h.akbar13 8 June 2008
Good: CMOS sensor, 6.5fps, Live view, buttons are at right places, quite professional to handle
Bad: Canon 17-85mm Standard package lens
Comment: being an Astro photographer i always wanted to go for Canon 20Da, but now Canon dont make it any more so i found 40D the best choice to go for. It has live view just like 20Da but it a much much bigger screen, T2 mount (the mount used to connect to telescopes) compatibility is on here and can get a T2 mount for like $50. The high ISO noise reduction works better then any thing i have seen..
10/10 From an Astro photographer
John Anderson 18 October 2007
Good: I love everything about the camera
Bad: I wish it was less expensive
See all 2 user reviews