Gaming desktops
Round-up reviews let you compare four related products and find out which one is best for you
Round-up by: Rory Reid
Last updated: 20 Dec 2005
A PC isn't just for surfing the Web and writing your CV on -- they're also quite good for running 3D games. Unfortunately, PC technology moves so quickly it's almost impossible to stay up to date with the latest components. A high-end computer bought six months ago may now be rendered relatively obsolete -- so how do you avoid buying a complete gaming turkey this Christmas?
The first thing you'll need to consider when buying a gaming desktop is what type of processor it uses. Many argue that the current king of the gaming CPU roost is AMD, and for good reason. Its Athlon 64 processors are faster than their Pentium 4 counterparts. If you're serious about gaming, the top of the range FX-55 and FX-57 processors provide unmatched gaming horsepower.
The other major factor in a gaming desktop is the graphics card. Presently there are only two manufacturers worth considering: ATI and Nvidia. Neither is clearly better than the other at producing cards, as they consistently play a game of performance leapfrog every six months or so.
If you want the absolute best of the best, you'll need to look for a PC that uses an Nvidia 6800 or 7800 series graphics card, or something from the ATI X850 or X1800 range. There are many factors that affect a card's performance, but as a rough guide, you can judge their approximate performance by looking at its clock speed and number of pixel shader pipelines. Memory is also an important factor, but marginally less so once you get above 256MB. You can view detailed specifications of graphics cards from their respective manufacturers' Web sites.
All the aforementioned graphics cards can run in dual-card configurations. Nvidia uses what is referred to as a Serial Link Interface (SLI), while ATI's take on the technology known as Crossfire. Both have slightly different implementations, but both will typically yield far better frame rates than a single card, particularly at high resolutions.
Finally, you'll have to give serious thought to the type of monitor that accompanies your gaming desktop. If you're serious about gaming, you can forget about 17- and 19-inch TFT displays straight away. The vast majority of these have a native resolution of 1,280x1,024 pixels -- to get the most out of your expensive new graphics card and CPU, you'll want to run games at a resolution of at least 1,600x1,200 pixels. For this, you'll need an ordinary CRT monitor, or a TFT screen larger than 20 inches.

Compare Products
![]() Dell Dimension XPS 600 |
![]() Dell Dimension 9100 |
![]() Alienware Aurora 7500 SLI |
![]() Alienware Aurora Star Wars Edition |
|
| Review date | 14 Oct 05 | 7 Sep 05 | 26 Jul 05 | 11 Aug 05 |
| Editors' rating |
|
|
|
|
| Price range | £2,974 | £712 | £1,900 | £1,620 |
| Review summary | If you're not the kind of person that likes to dig components up from graves and solder them together while Futurama plays on a far-off television set, then a boxed extreme gaming machine may be the answer to your lust for high polygon-count online multiplayer games. While the Dell brand won't bring you elite status at a LAN party, the components inside will Read full review |
The 9100 is really what you make of it. The basic model, with an ATI Radeon X600 graphics card, is competent but unspectacular, while a more heartily equipped model with a powerful graphics card and a RAID array could make a decent Photoshop machine. Although the 9100 has few tricks up its sleeve, it's a solid machine with plenty of potential Read full review |
Serious gamers fall into two categories. The first type is those who enjoy hotwiring together obscure components dug up from graves, adding liquid cooling systems and squeezing the last iota of heat tolerance out of an overclocked P4. The second lot are the ones who buy a gaming PC like they buy a console: pre-configured for max performance. The Aurora 7500 is for them Read full review |
Unashamedly cashing-in on George Lucas' billion-dollar franchise, the Star Wars Edition is nevertheless an audacious gaming machine with more than enough firepower to run today's most demanding multiplayer games. Although it's stocked with one fewer graphics cards than the last Aurora we reviewed, there is little perfomance penalty. This PC kicks Rebel ass Read full review |
| User rating | ||||
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Processor type | Pentium D | Pentium 4 | Athlon 64 | Athlon 64 3000+ |
| Processor family | Intel Pentium | Intel Pentium | AMD Athlon | AMD Athlon |
| Processor manufacturer | Intel | Intel | AMD | AMD |
| RAM installed | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
| Max supported RAM | 2048 GB | 4 GB | 2048 GB | 2 GB |
| Hard drive size | 500 GB | 160 GB | 160 GB | 250 GB |
| CD / DVD type | Writer | DVD-ROM | DVD±RW (±R DL) | DVD-ROM |
| Graphics processor | nVidia GeForce 7800GTX 256MB Dual Card | nVidia GeForce 6800 | Two nVidia GeForce 6800 cards | Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra PCX 256MB DDR3 w/Digital and TV Out |
| Operating system | Windows XP | n/a | Windows XP | Microsoft Windows XP Home SP 2 |
| Display type | n/a | n/a | None | n/a |
| Full specification | Full specification | Full specification | Full specification |
Want to compare other products?
You can choose up to four products to compare on the Compare Products page






