Image quality
Despite the extra time the L830 takes trying
to reduce noise at ISO 400 and above, it doesn't help much. Fine
details, such as small text, become blurry smears and heavy grain still
washes over the pictures. Photos look much better at ISO 200 and below,
though fine details still appear slightly soft.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
| Typical shot-to-shot time | |
Time to first shot | |
Shutter lag (typical) | |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
The L830's pictures generally look good enough for emailing and Web sites, but you should be careful when making prints. Pictures shot at ISO 200 or below might look OK at sizes up to A4, though ISO 400 or higher shots shouldn't be blown up beyond 152x102mm (6x4 inches).
Besides noise and softened details, the L830 suffers from significant barrel distortion when shooting at the wide end of the lens. On the bright side, the camera reproduces colors well, and they stay intact up to ISO 800. At the camera's highest sensitivity of ISO 1,600, colours predictably become washed out, though at that level you won't see enough detail for that to really matter.
Conclusion
The Samsung L830 offers a strange mix of
photographer-friendly controls, middling performance and disappointing
picture quality. Its slow shooting and poor pictures at higher
sensitivity settings seriously hurt the camera's flexibility, but its
generous set of manual exposure and colour controls give you plenty of
ways to tweak your low-ISO shots.
Considering its scant price
tag, the L830 offers a lot of camera for experienced, budget-minded
photographers. If you ever need to shoot at ISO 400 or higher, though,
look for another camera. The older
If you're willing to go for a larger camera, Canon's
Meanwhile, Sony's
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday