Samsung L77 review

In this review

Image quality
Despite some flaws, the L77's pictures look good. Colours generally appear neutral and saturated, though dark subjects tend to lose some detail. Noise becomes apparent at levels as low as ISO 200, but it manifests in a gentle grain that generally will only appear on computer monitors and not in your prints.

Shooting speed (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Typical shot-to-shot time
Time to first shot
Shutter lag (typical)
Canon Digital IXUS 950 IS
1.7
1.2
0.5
Casio Exilim EX-V7
1.6
1.5
0.5
Samsung L77
2.4
1.9
0.5
Samsung NV7 OPS
2
3.1
0.5
Samsung L74 Wide
2.8
4.4
0.9

 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Casio Exilim EX-V7
1.4
Canon Digital IXUS 950 IS
1.4
Samsung L74 Wide
1.4
Samsung L77
1.3
Samsung NV7 OPS
0.8

This unobtrusive noise remains even up to ISO 800, though a lot of fine detail, such as small text, and shadow detail is lost along the way, so images at higher ISOs end up less sharp and with a narrower dynamic range. At ISO 1,600, noise levels skyrocket, creating a fuzzy static that muddles colour and consumes detail.

Conclusion
If you want a simple, pocket-friendly point-and-shoot camera with a strong zoom, give the Samsung L77 a try. With its slim body, relatively powerful lens and solid image quality, the Samsung L77 should appeal to snapshooters. Its performance is sluggish, though, and its dearth of manual controls will turn off more advanced photographers.

Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday

Tell us what you think

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Step 1

0 out of 5

Step 2

Submit

Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment

Should I buy it?

Front of Samsung L77

Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Samsung L77

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2012 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.