(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
|
|
Wake-up time |
|
Shutter lag (bright) |
|
Shutter lag (dim) |
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
|
|
Typical shot-to-shot time |
|
Flash shot-to-shot time |
|
Raw shot-to-shot time |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Image quality
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30's images looked good, and sometimes very good, with accurate colours and exposure. But more often than not, we ran into problems. For instance, when using the spot meter, we experienced erratic colour accuracy and exposure, with wide variations from shot to shot. A deep, almost cartoonish-blue rendering of water turned almost turquoise in another shot. Exposures varied as well. Centre-weighted and wide-area metering delivered more consistent and usable results.
We also expected more than we got from the lens and focusing options. Although most of our test shots came out sharp, they weren't as crisp as we had hoped. Fine details should have been sharper, too. The lens was also responsible for occasionally severe purple fringing along high-contrast edges, as well as some reddish and blue edging of tree limbs against the sky.
The camera did an especially good job with macro shots -- just be sure to turn down the flash, or you'll get blown-out photos. Beware of flash vignetting in the wide-angle macro mode, too: the lens barrel leaves a shadow at the bottom of the frame when shooting in landscape orientation.
Furthermore, while the FZ30 exhibited good dynamic range, it tended to blow out highlights in brighter scenes. Using the backlight feature in auto mode exacerbated clipped highlights because it brightened the overall image.
Finally, the FZ30 delivered far noisier shots at ISO 80 then it should. The manual noise-reduction adjustment helped at ISO 80 and 100, but at higher speeds, the problems were both more visible and less responsive to our attempts at reduction.
Edited by Lori Grunin
Additional editing by Nick Hide
User reviews3
Add your review
No Planes 21 November 2011
Good: solid all-round performer
Bad: low light noise
Comment: despite the age of this camera it consistently takes outstanding pictures
Tom Mushroom 19 July 2006
Good: The zoom is excellent
Bad: It's big and needs getting used to.
Comment: Bought this because I wanted more zoom. Been shooting for years with a little Pentax Optio which has 3x optical. The Lumix has 12x - as simple as that.
Darren Mottershead 18 April 2006
Good: Build quality is excellent
Bad: A little on the large side
Comment: All in all this is a great camera in which you can get some excellent results, I dont think you will get a better camera for the £359 I paid for mine.
See all 3 user reviews