Ad: Get our free CNET Android app

Nikon Coolpix S220 review

In this review

The S220's best photo results come at ISO 80 and ISO 100. As soon as you go up to ISO 200, detail and sharpness start a steady decline. Unfortunately, the camera seems to love ISO 400 when the sensitivity is set to auto. There are three remaining sensitivities above ISO 400 -- 800, 1,600 and 2,000 -- but they're really not usable for prints. If you're in low or dark lighting, however, you'll be able to capture photos without a flash and, although they're ridiculously grainy and void of detail, they aren't without their charm. Just don't look at them too closely.

Colours aren't exactly accurate, but are pleasing and fairly natural-looking, with the exception of blues, which occasionally look too vibrant. The dynamic range of the camera seems limited overall. Highlights are a bigger issue, frequently appearing blown out. Also, the auto white balance is too warm indoors -- take the time to use the more accurate presets or the manual white balance option. Finally, the lens has some barrel and pin-cushion distortion, but it's effectively corrected by the camera's distortion control option. The lens distortion creates a fair amount of purple fringing in high-contrast areas -- something that's characteristic of this class of camera.

Video results are decent. They're good enough for Web use, but grainy, with noticeable colour banding.

Shooting speed (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Time to first shot  
Typical shot-to-shot time (flash)  
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Shutter lag (dim)  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Canon PowerShot A480
1.8 
5.6 
2.7 
0.6 
0.6 
Kodak EasyShare M1093 IS
2.8 
1.4 
1.2 
1 
0.5 
Nikon Coolpix S230
3.5 
3.3 
3 
1 
0.5 
Pentax Optio E70
2.4 
4.2 
3.3 
1.2 
0.6 
Nikon Coolpix S220
2.2 
3.3 
3 
1.3 
0.8 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (in frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Kodak EasyShare M1093 IS
2 
Nikon Coolpix S220
1.3 
Canon PowerShot A480
0.6 
Pentax Optio E70
0.6 

Conclusion
The inexpensive, lightweight, ultra-compact Nikon Coolpix S220 might not take particularly great pictures -- especially when viewed at full size -- but it really comes down to what you're after. If it's capturing the moment so that you can share with friends and family online, and you're sick of using your phone and want more control over the end results, the S220 is a viable option.

Additional editing by Charles Kloet

User reviews2

Add your review

Jonathan Peter Campbell's avatar

Jonathan Peter Campbell 18 September 2010

Good: Everything!

Bad: Nothing!

Comment: Good camera for £120

I own it
SMCneeM's avatar
1.5 stars out of 5

SMCneeM 2 May 2010

Good: It looks good and is compact

Bad: consistently poor photos regardless of light conditions

Comment: I previously had a cheap Vivitar which took really crisp photos, vastly superior to anything produced by the more expensive Nikon S220. I've tried all light conditions and settings but all the photos are just noisy, nothing is crisp. Nikon have just stamped their name on a pretty inferior product. I wish I'd gone for the equvalent Fujifilm camera which looked plasticky but gets better reviews. Don't be seduced by the good looks this camera is all fur coat and nae knickers.

Tell us what you think

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Step 1

0 out of 5

Step 2

Submit

Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment

Should I buy it?

Nikon Coolpix S220 angle

Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Nikon Coolpix S220

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2012 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.