This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Nikon Coolpix S220 review

Our rating

3.0 stars out of 5

User rating

1.5 stars out of 5

See all 2 user reviews

What do you think?

Verdict

The Nikon Coolpix S220 is an adequate, inexpensive choice for those who want to take photos that they can share on the Web

Good

  • Great design
  • Very compact
  • Very good features for its class

Bad

  • Mediocre photo quality
  • Slow performance

In this review

Just as there are people who only want a Flip Video-style camcorder for sharing video on the Web, so there are people who just want a small pocket camera for posting pictures on their favorite social-networking or photo-sharing Web site. The 10-megapixel Nikon Coolpix S220, available for around £120, is a Facebook camera, designed for snapshooters looking to step up from using their mobile phone as their primary camera.

Design
Despite its incredibly small size, the S220 is comfortable to use. It's lightweight to the point where you may forget you have it with you. It's available in six colours, too -- blue, silver, magenta, black, purple and green.


Unfortunately, the 64mm LCD display doesn't always accurately display photos

The control layout is straightforward, with the power, shutter release and zoom controls on top, and a directional pad and a handful of buttons on the back for menu navigation and shooting options. Pressing the menu button brings up mode-specific shooting options, along with a secondary menu tab for system settings.

The only disappointing part of the design is the LCD screen. Its size is fine, considering the camera's dimensions and price, and it's bright enough so that shooting in direct sunlight isn't a huge issue. The problem is the quality of the picture -- it frequently displays photos with off-colour pixels. That's likely to make users second-guess what they've actually captured with the camera.

Features
Shooting features are basic point-and-shoot fare for the most part. The auto mode gives you the most control, letting you set ISO, autofocus area mode, white balance, and exposure compensation. You get a handful of drive modes as well, including Nikon's Best Shot Selector, which snaps off 10 shots while the shutter's pressed and then saves the sharpest, and interval timer shooting, which takes a picture every 30 seconds, 1, 5 or 10 minutes. There's also a standard continuous setting.


The S220 is capable of taking good photos. This was taken at ISO 80 with the camera set to program auto mode. If you're into macro photography, though, this probably isn't the camera for you, since you can only get down to about 10cm from your subject. The 10-megapixel resolution buys you some room to crop in, such as in this picture (click image to enlarge)

If you like your scene modes, the S220 has 15 of them to pick from, or you can let the camera choose which it determines to be the most appropriate by using the auto scene selector mode. The camera's movie mode is limited to video clips of a 320x240- or 640x480-pixel resolution with sound, but you can't use the optical zoom while it's recording.

Performance
Like much of its competition, the S220 is a fairly slow performer. In well-lit conditions, it takes 0.8 seconds from pressing the shutter release to capturing a photo. Dimmer lighting causes the lag to go up to 1.3 seconds. If you're planning to use this camera for photographing children or pets, you'll probably be disappointed unless you're really good at anticipating shots. Its burst speed is pretty good, though, at 1.3 frames per second. The S220's shot-to-shot time averages 3 seconds without flash and gets only slightly longer with flash, at 3.3 seconds.

  • Print

User reviews2

Add your review

Jonathan Peter Campbell's avatar

Jonathan Peter Campbell 18 September 2010

Good: Everything!

Bad: Nothing!

Comment: Good camera for £120

I own it
SMCneeM's avatar
1.5 stars out of 5

SMCneeM 2 May 2010

Good: It looks good and is compact

Bad: consistently poor photos regardless of light conditions

Comment: I previously had a cheap Vivitar which took really crisp photos, vastly superior to anything produced by the more expensive Nikon S220. I've tried all light conditions and settings but all the photos are just noisy, nothing is crisp. Nikon have just stamped their name on a pretty inferior product. I wish I'd gone for the equvalent Fujifilm camera which looked plasticky but gets better reviews. Don't be seduced by the good looks this camera is all fur coat and nae knickers.

Tell us what you think

Log in with your CNET UK or Facebook account to post a user review, or click Join to create an account

Step 1

0 out of 5

Step 2

Submit

Please log in, register or login with Facebook to add a review or comment

Should I buy it?

Nikon Coolpix S220 angle

Ask your Facebook friends and Twitter followers if you should buy the Nikon Coolpix S220

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.