Performance
Shooting speed is the big disappointment,
mostly because of the slow focusing system. On one hand, it wakes up
and snaps in a flash -- 1.3 seconds -- and in good light there's only a
0.6-second lag between pressing the shutter and capture. But when the
light's not so good, capture lag jumps to an unacceptably high 2.2
seconds. Typical shot-to-shot time is a seriously sluggish 3.3 seconds,
which jumps to a snailish 4 seconds with flash. The S5700 constrains
the number of burst frames to about 8, with an effective typical
continuous shooting rate of 0.5fps and at best 0.7fps.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
| Typical shot-to-shot time | |
Time to first shot | |
Shutter lag (dim) | |
Shutter lag (typical) | |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Image quality
The S5700's high ISO sensitivity shots don't look too
bad, especially for a camera in its price range. But you can see some
typical smeariness and a general lack of sharpness all around, which
gets exacerbated as you increase sensitivity. So while you don't want
to completely avoid settings of ISO 800 and below, you certainly don't
want to use them as frequently as Fujifilm would have you.
By other criteria -- predominantly white balance and exposure -- the S5700 performs quite well. The lens has some distortion problems on the left side and a frequent problem with purple fringing on high-contrast edges, but these are also common in megazoom lenses. Movies look and sound fine, but are highly compressed with visible artefacts. Though they're recorded using Motion JPEG, they're squashed down to about 880Kbps and use mono audio. On the upside, the lens can zoom while recording. Both the EVF (electronic viewfinder) and LCD are fast and bright, but they only cover 97 per cent of the scene.

Conclusion
If you ignore most of the off-key bells and whistles and stick to
basics such as moderate ISO speed settings and semi-manual exposure modes,
the Fujifilm FinePix S700 offers quite a bit for your money. If Fuji
had only traded some of those high ISO gimmicks for better shooting
speed and a more streamlined interface, this might have been a darn
good camera.
As it is, you're better off spending just a tad more and buying one of last year's now-price-reduced models, such as the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 or Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2.
Additional editing by Nick Hide
User reviews2
Add your review
vilgraf 9 January 2010
Good: Manual controls
Bad: Image quality
Chris Nurden 4 August 2007
Good: Picture clarity and ease of use
Bad: Lens cover doesn't fit very well
Comment: Having just bought this camera from Hong Kong for the measely price of £89.00 yes thats right £89.00.
It is a compact design very robust in build which after my Canon A540 powershot (nice camera, too flimsy) is something of a revelation.
The controls on the back do take some getting used to but with a little patience I seem to be mastering with some excellent results. Macro photography is outstanding. 10x Optical Zoom also produces some great results and the colour obtained amazes me. Downloading photos to pc is very easy.
The only part of the camera I have problems with is the flash, this is more of a failing on my part as I keep forgetting that it pops up when needed, and I usually have my finger on it. I will learn. The only other thing I must say is why, oh why didn't I buy it before I went to New York
See all 2 user reviews