Performance
In a criminal move for a superzoom, the S1000fd has no optical image
stabilisation. Instead it relies on the sensitivity-boosting method of
increasing shutter speed. In any other manufacturer's camera this would
be a major black mark for the consequent noise problems, but Fujifilm
is noted for dealing well with noise.
Indeed, the S1000fd's biggest strength is its decent image quality at faster ISO speeds. Even at the maximum ISO 3,200, detail is still relatively crisp, with colours not too washed-out. Best of all, image noise, although clearly in evidence, does not overwhelm the picture.

Despite not being the most heavyweight lens in the sector, the S1000 suffers from various optical problems. There is some barrel distortion at the wide angle, and purple fringing shows up more often than we'd like.
Face detection is great at finding static subjects, but autofocus is pretty slow and can be foxed by changing lighting conditions or fast-moving subjects.

We had no complaints about battery life, bearing in mind that the S1000fd is powered by AA batteries. We didn't have to change the batteries in a week of use, taking about 100 shots. The flash even cycles quickly, considering it uses AAs.
Conclusion
The Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd is something of a let-down. In a
category often accused of falling between two stools, the S1000fd fails
to play to the strengths of a superzoom, as its bigger brother, the FinePix S8100fd,
does so well. It may be small, but a half-heartedly specced lens and
fussy controls mean that the genuinely pocketable and easy-to-use Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5 does the compact superzoom thing much better.
Edited by Nick Hide
User reviews2
Add your review
Minto 5 April 2011
Good: Zoom, picture settings
Bad: Colours, image quality
Comment: It is a decent enough all round camera but the picture quality can be blurry and the colours can appear a bit cold. It has a good zoom and a good range of picture settings.
Hannah Teasdale 28 October 2010
Good: Size, flash,
Bad: controls, blur control, lens
Comment: It's a good camera for someone who doesn't want to go into photography, It's a good first camera for someone who wants slightly higher quality, but if I were you I just wouldn't bother, go for a Nikon or a Canon. You can get something much better for the same price. I find that the colours aren't as accurate or vibrant as they should be. Same with the blur control, not very good.
See all 2 user reviews