Performance
In
our performance tests, the EX-S880 showed mixed results. After a
1.5-second wait from power-on to first shot, we could snap a new photo
every 1.8 seconds with the onboard flash turned off. With the flash on,
however, that wait increased to 2.8 seconds.

The shutter felt responsive enough, lagging just 0.5 seconds with our high-contrast target and 1.1 seconds with our low-contrast target. In burst mode, the camera captured 10 8-megapixel photos in 9.6 seconds, for a disappointing rate of less than 1.1fps.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
| Typical shot-to-shot time | |
Time to first shot | |
Shutter lag (typical) | |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Image quality
Softness
plagues the EX-S880's photos. Noise stays low through ISO 400, but
becomes a blanket of snow at the camera's maximum of ISO 800. The
camera reproduces colour fairly well, though it tends to oversaturate,
making some colours look garish at times.
The camera's automatic white balance does a good job in most lighting situations but incandescent-lit shots can come out slightly too warm. Unfortunately, the massive softness nullifies most positive points, and Casio's noise-reduction processing only exacerbates what looks like a soft lens to begin with.
While the camera technically takes 8-megapixel pictures, very little appreciable detail finds its way past the blanket of blur, making things such as text and the textures of fabrics hard to discern when shooting at ISO 200 or above.
Conclusion
The
Casio Exilim EX-S880 tries to slide by as an upgraded EX-S770 with a
higher resolution and a different image processor. Unfortunately, it
doesn't meet the standards set by its predecessor. While a new image
processor usually means faster performance, the EX-S800 performs slower
and photos are terribly soft compared to the older camera.
Alternately, you might want to look
to another manufacturer. For example,
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday
User reviews1
Add your review
stevehobfg 4 December 2008
Good: Small, light, fast, good battery life, good screen... But...
Bad: ...Poor picture quality! (Which is a bad thing for a camera!)
Comment: For usability, it pretty good. The screen is nice, the battery life good. It starts up quickly and saves shots quickly. It is a pleasure to use.
The realy big down side is the shot quality. They are colourful and well exposed, but as they said in the Cnet review they are soft (soft like an old movie stars close up).
When I first got it I kept checking the lens for dirt and even played with the focus and exposure to try and clear it up. But it just remains soft. This is no problem if you only want a small (sub A4) print, but if you want to zoom in on something - forget it!
Disappointing!
See all user reviews