Image quality
Image quality from the 960 IS is very
impressive and clean at lower ISOs. Colours are accurate and well
saturated, and exposures tend to be accurate, even in some tough
situations.
For example, the camera did a good job of balancing the built-in flash with the ambient light from the lamp in our test scene, though it wasn't quite powerful enough to pull significant detail out of the dark fur of the plush ape in the scene.
Canon does an excellent job of keeping ISO noise under control through ISO 200. At ISO 400, noise becomes noticeable on monitors, but shouldn't cause problems with prints and doesn't cause any noticeable loss of shadow or fine detail. At ISO 800, noise becomes much more noticeable and some, though not all, shadow detail is lost while most fine detail remains. That said, you should still be able to get decent prints, especially at smaller sizes.
At ISO 1,600, noise becomes very heavy and most shadow and fine detail, such as text and the markings on the measuring tape in our scene, is lost. We suggest staying below ISO 1,600 when shooting with the 960 IS and staying below ISO 800 whenever possible.
Conclusion
For a 12-megapixel compact camera, the
Digital IXUS 960 IS fares well. But, if you don't feel you need so many
pixels, and unless you plan to print 17x11-inch images regularly, then
you can probably get faster performance by choosing a camera with fewer
megapixels, such as Canon's 8-megapixel Digital IXUS 860 IS -- but you will have to give up the optical viewfinder if you do.
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday
User reviews1
Add your review
velocette 20 November 2007
Good: Image quality, superb!!!
Bad: A little slow.
Comment: This camera produces pictures which are a great deal better than an EOS20D Ihave dumped.
See all user reviews