Image quality
Image quality from the IXUS 80 IS is quite
nice for a camera of its class. Its automatic white balance does a
good -- but not perfect -- job of neutralising colours under a variety of
light sources. It adds warmth to incandescent-lit shots and a touch of
green to fluorescent, but does a great job in natural daylight. The
camera's tungsten setting did a good job of neutralising the harsh
yellow cast of our tungsten hot lights.
While noise isn't completely nonexistent at ISO 80, you'll have to look quite closely to find any at this lowest sensitivity or at ISO 100, and both settings offer pleasingly sharp images with plenty of shadow detail. By ISO 200, you'll start to notice noise, especially in shadows, though there is still plenty of sharpness to the images.
At ISO 400, noise still isn't over the top, and there is a surprising amount of sharpness, though we saw a noticeable roll-off in shadow detail. Things get precipitously worse at ISO 800, though you still might be able to get a decent 152x102mm (4x6-inch) print under ideal circumstances. By ISO 1,600, images look as if they're shot during a hailstorm. We suggest staying below ISO 800 whenever possible.
Conclusion
Given
the success of the IXUS 70, we were surprised that Canon lets the
camera's shot-to-shot time slide with the IXUS 80 IS. The company makes
up for it by adding optical image stabilisation and keeping the
impressive image quality of its predecessor.
Despite our whinging, the IXUS 80 IS is still a very nice camera, and if you're going to make a trade off anywhere, we'd rather wait longer between shots than sacrifice image quality or shutter lag. As long as you don't mind the long flash recycle time, Canon's Digital IXUS 80 IS makes a great choice for a relatively inexpensive ultracompact camera.
If
optical image stabilisation doesn't mean that much to you though, you
should probably see if you can find still find the
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday
User reviews4
Add your review
Exeter 23 December 2008
Good: small
Bad: too small
Comment: testing if it lets me write second review and vote 2nd time, sorry
Exeter 23 December 2008
Good: small
Bad: too small
Comment: testing if it lets me write second review and vote 2nd time, sorry
Exeter 23 December 2008
Good: size, easy-to-use, speed, low noise
Bad: no optical zoom while recording
Comment: PROS (sorry, I had it for two days only)
simple use
voice memo
voice dictaphone
li-ion battery
European and UK leads both supplied
easy menus
good speed with quick SD card
low noise with both dictaphone and film recording
normal/LP/youtube/interval motion picture recording
CONS
no USB charging
software on CD needs improvement
no optical zoom while recording
rotated the captured images when it should not - but function can be turned off
Bottom line
Excellent digital camera for pictures, films or dictaphone
See all 4 user reviews