Creative seems to bump up the contrast, saturation and sharpness so the video makes a better first impression, but the Vado HD doesn't adjust exposure quite as quickly as the Mino HD, the white balance is slightly off (for example, fluorescent light ends up with a slightly greenish hue), and you'll see more fringing around brightly lit objects. We also noticed the same slight judder as we did with the Mino HD.
Low-light performance was pretty decent, although we felt the Mino HD had fewer artefacts and performed better. The audio sounds about the same: relatively clean, and, as long as the speaker doesn't mumble, the tiny mic does a creditable job of picking up the sound.
Conclusion
After seeing the results of shooting with each camcorder -- and assessing their feature sets -- we have to say it's pretty much a toss-up between the two similarly priced models. The Creative Vado HD has the edge in features, and maybe design, particularly if you want the larger LCD, while the Mino HD has a slight edge in video quality. It's a tough call.
Additional editing by Nick Hide
User reviews1
Add your review
teddybear 12 February 2009
Good: Slim nice design
Bad: Battery life a little bit poor
Comment: The slim light design is easy to carry around. It is extremely easy to operate. No experience is required. It is suppose to capture 2 hours of HD digital video although it doesn't seem to last that long so 8GB memory is plenty. The HDMI cable was supplied in the box a added bonus. Bought mine from Okobe.co.uk. Not sure why but they dont have it anymore? Not popular or too popular? Maybe the later. But it is pricey!
See all user reviews