The new lens performs surprisingly well. Not only does the SuperRange optical image stabilisation system work satisfactorily all the way out to the end, but the lens focuses quickly and holds the lock in both dim and bright conditions. Images look sharp, too.
On the downside, high-contrast edges show more fringing than usual. The stereo microphone sits beneath the lens and generally delivers good audio quality. However, in recent models Canon changed the wind filter option from a forced-on to automatic, and ever since we've found it far less effective.
As is usual with compact designs, Canon provides a new 890mAh battery with the HF100, the
Though the HF100 incorporates a smaller, 1/3.2-inch 3.3-megapixel CMOS sensor than the HV30, the video still looks quite good: properly exposed, nicely saturated, and sharp. In low light the video displays more noise and a somewhat compressed tonal range, but retains a significant amount of detail and fares above average compared with the rest of its class.
Conclusion
The HF100 is an excellent choice for
flash-based HD recording. But then the real question becomes which
model is the better deal -- the HF10 or the HF100. The cost difference
between the two closely reflects the current pricing of the
HF10's internal 16GB of flash memory, which makes it tempting to
recommend buying the cheaper model and springing for an additional card
when the prices inevitably fall -- or paying the same for a larger
card, when they inevitably ship -- later in the year. On the other
hand, the HF10's black body is more attractive than the HF100's
grey. Decisions, decisions.
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday
Android App 
RSS Feeds 
iPhone App 
Newsletters