The new lens performs surprisingly well. Not only does the SuperRange optical image stabilisation system work satisfactorily all the way out to the end, but the lens focuses quickly and holds the lock in both dim and bright conditions. Images look sharp, too.
On the downside, high-contrast edges show more fringing than usual. The stereo microphone sits beneath the lens and generally delivers good audio quality. However, in recent models Canon changed the wind filter option from a forced-on to automatic, and ever since we've found it far less effective.
As is usual with compact designs, Canon provides a new 890mAh battery with the HF10, the
Though the HF10 incorporates a smaller, 1/3.2-inch 3.3-megapixel CMOS sensor than the HV30, the video still looks quite good: properly exposed, nicely saturated and sharp. In low light, the video displays more noise and a somewhat compressed tonal range, but retains a significant amount of detail and fares above average compared with the rest of its class.
Conclusion
The HF10 is an excellent choice for
flash-based HD recording. But then the real question becomes which
model is the better deal -- the HF10 or the HF100. The cost difference
between the two closely reflects current pricing of 16GB of flash
memory, which makes it tempting to recommend buying the cheaper model
and springing for an additional card when the prices inevitably fall. Alternatively, you could pay the same for a larger card, when they inevitably ship later in the year. On the other hand, the HF10's black body is so much
more attractive than the HF100's silver. Decisions, decisions.
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday
iPhone App 
Newsletters 
RSS Feeds 
Send Us Tips