What is it: DVD-based camcorder with 24p support
What we think: Nice video and decent photo quality, but there are some operational issues
Canon HR10 Review
Reviewed on: 9 November 2007
Performance
Video performance -- autofocus and exposure --
are pretty good. In sufficient light, the autofocus adjusts relatively
quickly when panning from object to object thanks to the Instant AF,
and the autoexposure corrects swiftly, as well. As expected, it's a bit
slower in dim light, and the autofocus pulses slightly.
The 69mm (2.7-inch) widescreen LCD, with its playback controls on the bezel, works well enough for manual focusing, though it's a bit small. The eye-level viewfinder struck us as a bit coarse at first, but we eventually got used to it. The audio comes through quite clearly, but the wind filter didn't seem quite as effective as with past models -- perhaps because the microphone sits in the front of the camcorder, or the wind was simply stronger than usual.
Other operational aspects suffer from the DVD curse, however. Though there's no lag when starting and stopping recording, other disc-related tasks impose annoying overhead. For example, initializing a DVD-RW disc takes over a minute -- 17.7 seconds to bring up the initialisation menu screen and another 44.8 seconds to format the disc -- while a DVD-R takes about 40 seconds total, 20.1 seconds to prepare and 18.6 to format.
Since each disc holds only about 15 minutes of best-quality video, it seems like a good idea to format a bunch of discs in advance. When you power on the camcorder with a prepared disc in it, you'll wait 20.5 seconds for it to spin up -- at least with a DVD-RW -- before you can record.
At the other end of the shoot, it takes a while to finalise discs for playback. Though duration depends upon how much of the disc is empty, our test with a DVD-R holding 10 minutes of video -- 10 clips -- took four minutes to finalise. All in all, it's not really a format you'd want to use for shooting children's plays or sports.
Image quality
Like its siblings, however, the HR10's
video looked quite good: sharp and saturated with reasonable contrast.
Its automatic white balance does tend to be a little cool, though, and
as with many models highlights routinely blow out.
Its low-light video looks better than usual for Canon, a bit muddy but with far less noise than we typically see. Plus the HR10's video looks mighty impressive on an HDTV connected via HDMI (the cable is optional).
Conclusion
If it weren't for the DVD/AVCHD double
whammy, the HR10 might have more to recommend it. For now your best bet
is to stick with one of Canon or Sony's tape-based HDV models, or at
least avoid the DVD issue and opt for one of the hard-drive-based
options.
Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday
Tell us what you think
Do you own this product? Want to share your experiences with other CNET UK users?
Write your own review of the Canon HR10
Can't find the product you're looking for? Want to suggest a product for review?

Special Offers from our Sponsors
Latest Camcorder Reviews
Samsung HMX-H106SP
Weak performance and lacklustre video quality make it hard to recommend this camcorder
Samsung SMX-F34
Has plenty of features for a budget camcorder, but its video quality isn't particularly impressive
on Camcorders
Sony Mobile HD Snap Camera: Webbie takes on Flip in the UK
The Sony PM1 Mobile HD Snap -- previously known as the Webbie -- is heading for British shores to challenge Flip's dominance of the mini-camcorder market
More:







